Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
Supergeo Renews Partnership Agreement with Information & Science Techno System Co. in Japan
GISCI Begins Exam Development
Esri and Institute of Fire Engineers Partner to Improve Fire Prevention Planning
Canadian Organizations Shine at the 2013 Esri International User Conference
Atlantic Secures Key Environmental Services Designation from GSA
Conference Addresses the use of Geographic Intelligence for Business and Security

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
GIS Needs Analysis-TN
GPS Equipment*Canada
Surveying Services*Canada
Hydrological Assessment*Belize
Nautical Charts*Poland

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: RE: GISList: Re: Section 508 Question - Visual disabilities and m aps
Date:  08/16/2001 09:15:48 PM
From:  David.Irving .. santos.com.au




Ronald makes a point here which doesn't receive enough attention in these
days of comparatively cheap colour reproduction, which is that colour has
no intrinsic meaning. I recall reading in one of Bertin's books that colour
should _never_ be used to represent quantitative data (how big is red?).
That said, it's still handy to use colour to represent qualitative
differences, but then the colours need to be carefully chosen (partly
because of our psychological responses to them), particularly when the
needs of a colour-blind audience are to be considered. Qualitative
differences can be shown well with different infill patterns, but then we
need to be careful to use infills of the same density, so as not to imply
some quantitative difference that doesn't exist. It's lucky there are still
cartographers around, but unfortunate that our skills are so rarely used.

Regards,
David




Ronald Cossman
<Ronald.Cossman@ssrc.ms To: gislist@geocomm.com
state.edu> cc:
bcc:
17/08/2001 05:46 Subject: RE: GISList: Re: Section 508 Question - Visual disabilities
and m aps





Humm. It seems that a common thread is that maps (or Web pages or whatever)
fail to communicate when they are solely using color to convey an abstract
concept. To wit, David Irving's comments about being able to read a topo
map
under nightlights make sense. You are simply trying to get from Point A to
Point B, and most topo maps, even when reproduced in a gray tone will still
convey the basic information.

Paul Henni pointed us to a get UK site about designing Web pages with the
color blind in mind. What is telling is how the functionality changes. If a
color-blind person can not see the blue highlighted text, the only visual
clue that it is a hyper-link or web address is the underline that is also
(conventionally) added. Notably we do not usually introduce a link with the
words, "What follows in a link."

Finally, to finish out this stair-step to abstraction, Jim Cueno had to
present colored zoning maps to City Council members who can not see the
colors. What they can see are the outlines of the city streets, parcels,
etc. But we rely upon color to convey abstract concepts (e.g. local zoning,
percent Hispanic, mortality rates, etc.) and a certain portion of the
population simply cannot see it. Perhaps we are venturing into the field of
symbology to suggest that maybe, for public use maps, we should consider
moving away from "abstract colors." By that I mean, what is the color of
mortality rates, or income inequality? Who the heck knows? It is not
intuitive. As long as you are mapping physical features then dirt will be
brown and water will be blue. But what about non-physical attributes?
Socially constructed indicators? Maybe parcel zoning should not be
represented by abstract colors at all (thereby avoiding the choices of
politically correct colors to represent different land uses) but instead by
symbols over a crosshatch to denote the parcel.

To illustrate the problems relative to the visualization of health data
look
at:
the most excellent Dartmouth Atlas project (hyper-link to follow):
http://www.dartmouthatlas.org/
or a new set of U.S. Census maps at (hyper-link to follow):
http://www.census.gov/population/www/cen2000/atlas.html


In conclusion, our task is usually to convey information in a visual
fashion
to a wide audience. Anything that makes that process more effective, which
could include reach a wider audience who cannot perceive colors, may be a
good thing. Perhaps the U.S. ADA legislation is an opportunity for us to
reexamine the widespread use and mis-use of colors in and on maps. Any
thoughts from those dealing with "abstract colors?"

Ron Cossman
MSU Social Science Research Center
Mississippi State University




-----Original Message-----
From: Henni, Paul HO [mailto:phoh@bgs.ac.uk\
Sent: Thursday, Aug

Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group