Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
Supergeo Renews Partnership Agreement with Information & Science Techno System Co. in Japan
GISCI Begins Exam Development
Esri and Institute of Fire Engineers Partner to Improve Fire Prevention Planning
Canadian Organizations Shine at the 2013 Esri International User Conference
Atlantic Secures Key Environmental Services Designation from GSA
Conference Addresses the use of Geographic Intelligence for Business and Security

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
GIS Needs Analysis-TN
GPS Equipment*Canada
Surveying Services*Canada
Hydrological Assessment*Belize
Nautical Charts*Poland

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: GISList: 80% of data having spatial reference and another type of statistics
Date:  12/23/2001 09:22:53 PM
From:  Andrea Giacomelli



Hi,

It was really interesting to me to follow this thread, and I appreciated
the contributions from the list.

Actually, there is another "buzz statistic" (could the term apply to
these cases ?...sorry: english is not my first language) on which it
might be interesting to clarify the sources.

In many presentations it has occurred to me to see or read about the
partitioning of (GIS) project resources into (1) data-related tasks, (2)
sw/hw and (3) human resources, with a few variant schemes.

What is interesting is that -in my experience- from time to time and
from case to case the "big slice" of the resource pie happens to shift
from one component to the other, with HW/SW generally being put at the
end of the list.

While I don't think that this type of inconsistency can lead to relevant
problems "in operations", and could be put in the "presentation
folklore" file, I wander what impact can this type of "information
tuning" have on an "unaware audience" of potential new GIS users.
Could this be interpreted as 'buy more digital data, do less training'
or vice versa ?


Regards,
--
=========================================
Andrea Giacomelli
http://www.crs4.it/~andreag
=========================================


To unsubscribe, write to gislist-unsubscribe@geocomm.com
________________________________________________________________________
Setup a GeoCommunity Account and have access to FAST DataDownloads
and Premium Career Posting at a discounted rate!
https://www.geocomm.com/cgi-bin/accounts/login

On-line Archives available at
http://spatialnews.geocomm.com/community/lists/


Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group