Hi,
It was really interesting to me to follow this thread, and I appreciated the contributions from the list.
Actually, there is another "buzz statistic" (could the term apply to these cases ?...sorry: english is not my first language) on which it might be interesting to clarify the sources.
In many presentations it has occurred to me to see or read about the partitioning of (GIS) project resources into (1) data-related tasks, (2) sw/hw and (3) human resources, with a few variant schemes.
What is interesting is that -in my experience- from time to time and from case to case the "big slice" of the resource pie happens to shift from one component to the other, with HW/SW generally being put at the end of the list.
While I don't think that this type of inconsistency can lead to relevant problems "in operations", and could be put in the "presentation folklore" file, I wander what impact can this type of "information tuning" have on an "unaware audience" of potential new GIS users. Could this be interpreted as 'buy more digital data, do less training' or vice versa ?
Regards, -- ========================================= Andrea Giacomelli http://www.crs4.it/~andreag =========================================
To unsubscribe, write to gislist-unsubscribe@geocomm.com ________________________________________________________________________ Setup a GeoCommunity Account and have access to FAST DataDownloads and Premium Career Posting at a discounted rate! https://www.geocomm.com/cgi-bin/accounts/login
On-line Archives available at http://spatialnews.geocomm.com/community/lists/
|