> To my memory he's correct about the hispanic being a question of decent, not race. That question always confused people when I had to ask it after asking the race question.
You must have worked on 1990 or before. They switched the order for the 2000 census because of that issue. And Hispanic is one of the two official ethnicities of the US census. The descent question has many more options (e.g. Irish and Welsh).
> I did love asking black people what race they were. I got quite a few laughs from 'em. :-)
In the old days (before about 1960) they didn't ask. At one time, the census used to give their workers diagrams of eye, nose, and lip shapes so they could "correctly" categorize people.
Think about the terrorist they've got in London whom they thought was Sri Lankan, but he turned out to be British/Jamaican. I'm using National categories here, but race is not easily distinguished by sight. I once asked two women sitting next to each other if they were sisters, but one of them was from Nepal, and the other was from the South Pacific! The truth is, race is a social construction, and physiognomy varies more within the so-called "races" than it does between them. If we can tell the difference between black and white, it's because we're ignoring a lot of other differences and similarities. Most black people in the United States have both European and African ancestry, for instance.
But don't get me started...
Beckee Morrison
To unsubscribe, write to gislist-unsubscribe@geocomm.com ________________________________________________________________________ Setup a GeoCommunity Account and have access to FAST DataDownloads and Premium Career Posting at a discounted rate! https://www.geocomm.com/cgi-bin/accounts/login
On-line Archives available at http://spatialnews.geocomm.com/community/lists/
|