Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
Supergeo Renews Partnership Agreement with Information & Science Techno System Co. in Japan
GISCI Begins Exam Development
Esri and Institute of Fire Engineers Partner to Improve Fire Prevention Planning
Canadian Organizations Shine at the 2013 Esri International User Conference
Atlantic Secures Key Environmental Services Designation from GSA
Conference Addresses the use of Geographic Intelligence for Business and Security

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
GIS Needs Analysis-TN
GPS Equipment*Canada
Surveying Services*Canada
Hydrological Assessment*Belize
Nautical Charts*Poland

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: RE: GISList: Manifold 5 IMS or GeoMicro's AltaMap Server
Date:  01/09/2002 06:38:28 PM
From:  Dimitri Rotow




> I posted a similar message over the holidays....
>
> Has anyone used either Manifold 5 IMS (www.manifold.net) or
> GeoMicro's AltaMap Server (www.geomicro.com). I'm interested in
> hearing people's experiences/thoughts about the products.
>

I use Manifold all the time, I'm not a professional programmer and even I
can create a web site using Manifold with zero programming. I am the
marketing product manager for Manifold but that doesn't mean I don't
appreciate the ability to create a web site without having to write and
debug a new application.

As a matter of basic philosophy, I think it's a real waste to have to learn
two different products to bring up a web site. With classic map server
architectures you have to learn a GIS to get your data in order and then you
have to learn to code a map server to bring your GIS project to the web.
That seems like a terrible waste of time to me. It's also a risk because
you can have two different vendors pointing fingers at each other if
something goes wrong. You also don't have the benefit of exactly the same
WYSIWYG environment in your GIS and your map server, so perhaps you'll have
to waste time re-formatting the data, etc.

I think it makes a lot more sense to procure and learn just one product, the
GIS, to create your project using the wonderful WYSIWYG interface of your
GIS and then publish it with a few clicks as a web page and know it will be
exactly as you created it. Building the map server into the GIS makes this
possible. It seems that once one company starts doing this they all will
have to.

What does everyone else think about this?

Note: For a third party opinion on Manifold, you might consider a posting on
Manifold-L, which is where most of the Manifold IMS users seem to hang out.
See http://www.manifold.net/news/news_set.html for links to get there.

Cheers,

Dimitri




To unsubscribe, write to gislist-unsubscribe@geocomm.com
________________________________________________________________________
Setup a GeoCommunity Account and have access to FAST DataDownloads
and Premium Career Posting at a discounted rate!
https://www.geocomm.com/cgi-bin/accounts/login

On-line Archives available at
http://spatialnews.geocomm.com/community/lists/


Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group