Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
Supergeo Renews Partnership Agreement with Information & Science Techno System Co. in Japan
GISCI Begins Exam Development
Esri and Institute of Fire Engineers Partner to Improve Fire Prevention Planning
Canadian Organizations Shine at the 2013 Esri International User Conference
Atlantic Secures Key Environmental Services Designation from GSA
Conference Addresses the use of Geographic Intelligence for Business and Security

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
GPS Equipment*Canada
Surveying Services*Canada
Hydrological Assessment*Belize
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: Re: GISList: GPS data collection spawns court case!
Date:  03/07/2002 06:05:18 PM
From:  Robert Heitzman



>An interesting post on another list poses the question, should GIS people
>be conducting land surveys?

Makes no difference what tool you use, it depends on what the requirements
are for the data and its quality. Certainly lowly GIS people should not do
"land surveys".

In the case of a hydrant inventory what's the legal requirement? If the
surveyor can lobby with the city to get a clause put into a contract, or
city standards, requiring his profession's services, that's fine. Not with
me, but with the lawyers.

A similar situation came up in the collection of TIGER street data.
Certainly GPS and aerial photo techniques are plenty accurate in themselves
to do the job within accuracy specifications. What was lacking was the
quality. The last round of TIGER data gathering was pitiful in some cases
because of unprofessional work. In the future rounds the TIGER folks will
have some clause in their contract that the data quality be to a certain
standard. This may very well require the services of a professional
surveyor. (And probably cost the taxpayer's a pretty penny since they will
probably go to full cadestral quality - watch for grumbling about charging
for TIGER in the future.)

But the TIGER case is a contract issue. It doesn't mean that every person
taking a street centerline has to be a surveyor. It only says if you what
to work a contract for TIGER you have to meet the contract.

Same applies to the hydrant data. If the consumer of the data is OK with
its accuracy and quality so be it. Now if they go to sell that hydrant (or
something more sellable - Brooklyn Bridge maybe) there are laws that would
rule out the hydrant survey data and require a true land survey.

Lawyer's, what ya gonna do! Only thing worse is a gullible politician that
pass stupid laws to keep the lawyer's in business. Outlaw GPS units now!!!


_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx



To unsubscribe, write to gislist-unsubscribe@geocomm.com
________________________________________________________________________
Setup a GeoCommunity Account and have access to FAST DataDownloads
and Premium Career Posting at a discounted rate!
https://www.geocomm.com/cgi-bin/accounts/login

On-line Archives available at
http://spatialnews.geocomm.com/community/lists/


Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group