How, may I ask does this tilt the balance anywhere ? Did we read the same article ? I'm just waiting for Dimitri to weigh in on this as well.
I can only imagine the sheer volume of "vertical silos" that exist within the national security establishment, all because of "open-source" yahoos that promote the technology, then fail to deliver the "holy-grail" of interoperability, transparency and longevity. The US Government, in all its forms and fashions is ESRI's biggest customer by far, always has been, without that customer base, it probably wouldn't exist. How "open" is that suite of products? Nada, zilch, zip. Is it going to be usurped by some "flavor of the month" attempt at "open source GIS". Not in our collective lifetimes.
Anthony
-----Original Message----- From: Harsh Prakash [mailto:hvp@regiononepdc.com] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 1:23 PM To: gislist@geocomm.com Subject: GISList: Re: Re: GIS software for the masses
FYI, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A60050-2002May22.html "Open-Source Fight Flares At Pentagon - Microsoft Lobbies Hard Against Free Software"
Re: GIS software for the masses ...interesting discussion earlier, this just tilts the balance in favor of open-source (gis+non-gis)
To unsubscribe, write to gislist-unsubscribe@geocomm.com ________________________________________________________________________ Setup a GeoCommunity Account and have access to FAST DataDownloads and Premium Career Posting at a discounted rate! https://www.geocomm.com/cgi-bin/accounts/login
On-line Archives available at http://spatialnews.geocomm.com/community/lists/
|