Ok... many of you know that I'm not one to let these things slip by sans comment!
It appears that Chris (and others) are having a difficult time adjusting to the new era and changing e-commerce models. I'm not surprised and your frustration is understood. However, as we have indicated before, GeoComm is a private business and even though some of you may feel different, we provide a valuable service to the GIS industry at large.
Some of you are now speculating that we are in dire need of revenues, yadayadya, however, the reality of it is that the time has come for us to move forward and progress with the e-commerce model that is working very well for us. Contrary to popular belief, traffic has steadily increased ever since we opened the doors (so to speak) and after several years of operation, we are very well positioned in all of the major search engines and have thousands of links into our various resources. This does not happen over night and believe it or not, it comes with a fairly hefty price tag. That's enough about our business model for now... Chris or Anthony, if your interested in our business model I suggest you contact our President to discuss our business plan further.
I won't allow myself to get drawn into a war of words with some of the frustrated few... I will point out though, that what GeoComm is going through is not much different than what many other successful e-commerce sites have done. The GeoCommunity has a vast wealth of knowledge and resources in addition to a vast collection of data, all conveniently accessible from one site. You can get you news, your data, enter discussions, rant on a list, look for a job, browse GIS bids etc... all in one convenient location. We have been imitated and copied yet we still keep on growing.
It's often difficult to adapt to change, however, you have to expect it. Believe it or not there are thousands of GeoComm account holders out there, many of them that gladly pay for premium access to data.
As for the person who feels that the GeoCommunity is a low-traffic site you couldn't be further from the truth! Randy is somewhat correct in that to satisfy the overwhelming demand, we have added a tier to data access, making it more accessible to people willing to pay a nominal access fee.
As a reminder, DRGs and DOQs are accessible only to account holders, the rest of the data is still available for download.
Occasionally we take flak for charging a fee as well as serving ads, however, believe it or not the ads serve a purpose. I bet everyone at some time has seen an ad that has caught their eye and turned them on to a nifty product that they have been waiting for! For our corporate clients, the vast, targeted audience is very attractive (and so it should be!).
Finaly, have you purchased a USA Today lately (or any other paper of magazine for that matter)? Note the news, resources, crosswords, and ads!
Anthony and Chris, remember, you are dealing with a business here (and a succesful one at that). I respond to you out of respect for the rest of the people on the list that you have also decided to vent to, however, I don't really feel that I owe you any detailed explanation. If you decide to ever pay for the services we provide I will be glad to answer your concerns.
Regards Glenn
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Glenn Letham, Managing Editor ThinkBurst Media, Inc ph: 850-897-6778 fx: 850-897-1001
The GeoCommunity http://www.GeoComm.com & The WirelessDeveloperNetwork http://www.WirelessDevNet.com
The web's largest GIS News Wire! email: editor@geocomm.com Subject=subscribe daily newsfeed
Send your news enquiries and submissions to pr@geocomm.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony Quartararo" <ajq3@spatialnetworks.com> To: <gislist@geocomm.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:03 PM Subject: RE: GISList: GIS Data Depot download limits
> Robert & Chris, > > This issue was beaten to death when the deal was inked with USGS/Geocomm > some time ago. GeoComm took a lot of flak from many people, including me, > right or wrong. But to justify GeoComm changing it's provisioning of the > data (a la pricing structure) after the fact is a slippery slope. What's > next, only 4k at a time unless you pay for better speed? > > This will continue to be a thorny issue for the USGS, because as impossible > as it may seem, GeoComm may not be around forever, especially if revenues > are dependent on ads as you make clear. What is the Survey going to do to > provide this data, yet again, to the public if that were to happen ? Sure, > it took more ongoing tax money each year to support the data provisioning > and other great services that the USGS provide(ed)(es), but it was > consistent and not co-dependent on market fluctuations and the whims of
|