Check out Maptitude www.caliper.com
1. Easy to learn and use compared to the others, and has a scripting language with many, many functions 2. It has functionality not found in most GISs at any price, 3. Company is friendly - unlike some we could name. The tech support is good. There is friendly listserve where folks help each other out more than I have experienced most places. 4. The manual is friendly and one can really learn it right out of the supplied documentation. It has "one minute exercises" which pretty much tell you all you need to know to make Maptitude work. 5. It reads (and exports) ESRI, MapInfo, etc data, often repairing files on the way in(and out) 6. Its affordable, comes with enough data to really do something.(like all the streets in the US, lots of the TIGER components, US Census, etc) They have an academic deal too. For Canadians, they might have data too.
I use it to teach courses in public health, disease surveillance, and exposure and health outcome assessment, and a summer class, this year an emphasis on bioterrorism http://healthlinks.washington.edu/nwcphp/niphp/
I also have participated in developing course work in the other GISs around, and I have found that for a course of 20 exercises developed in Maptitude, only about 8 can be transferred to ArcView or MapInfo. The reason is Maptitude's large number of features.
As far as teaching goes, when I teach other GISs in say a 3 day course, I find that by the beginning the of 3rd day students begin to finally understand enough about the software not to have to be coached through every step, they begin to stop stumbling around...
With Maptitude by noon on the first day people are making maps like crazy and generally are clear on the operational paradigm of the software. Each new feature of the software I introduce is consistent with the last one. NOT the case with some others. That leaves me to focus on CONTENT and not operating the software! I want to talk about spatial relationships in epidemiological investigations, not on how to get your state to stop looking like a pancake ...(recall that some prominent GIS software still can't handle projections without major interventions of the user)
Also I have taught Maptitude to 7th graders with no problems. I found them very adept at operating the software and especially clever at coming up with new ways to map. They broke all the rules of cartography but ... rules are to be broken.
The point of this is that Maptitude can be used at many levels.
BTW, if you want to get a class to really test the limits of the software, give a prize for the most outrageous map, that map that would cause a Swiss cartographer to gag ... but when you are finished, your class will have explored every feature, etc.
And, if you are doing Municipal GIS, then Maptitude's big sister Transcad is the GIS of choice for transportation.
Am I totally happy with Maptitude? Not always. I have "issues" but they are trivial compared with other vendors. Maptitude folks will talk about it and have responded. My opinion is that ESRI and MapInfo keep customers at a soccer field length ... if you are not paying for tech support, the likelihood of your having input is pretty small... having never bought their tech support, I'd be surprised if you had any input even then.
Incidentally I do not sell the software, no financial interest etc. I just use it. And if something came along that was better - I'd switch in the proverbial heartbeat.
Richard Hoskins PhD School of Public Health University of WA Seattle
-----Original Message----- From: Rick Gray [mailto:rick_gray@canoemail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:14 AM To: gislist@geocomm.com Subject: GISList: Teaching Software advice sought
Hello friends:
After a brief absence from the list, I am back. As you may deduce from my signature below, I have taken on some new and exciting challenges, and it is for one of these challenges that I am seeking advice from the list.
As GIS Program Liaison with Ridgetown College, I am involved in curriculum development for a new, one year, GIS Post Diploma Certificate program. Our program will focus on Agriculture and on Municipal GIS, the former because of the college's long history and expertise with agriculture, the latter because of the strong relationship we have with the local government and their interest in this program.
At this very early stage, we are considering courses in programming (VB, Avenue), database management (Access, Oracle, and SQL), some overview type courses that will cover the likes of cartographic principles, precision farming, etc., an intro to remote sensing, spatial stats, etc. - all, of course, with respect to our dual focus. We also would like to offer a course in data acquisition that will deal with GPS, data loggers, on-screen digitizing, etc. In other words, we want to provide students with the es
|