Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: Re: GISList: wave exposure calculations
Date:  08/29/2002 04:03:50 PM
From:  Viktoras Didziulis



Dear Bill,

Thank you very much for the information you sent. Actualy I think to
evaluate wave exposure with Baarseth index. This is more or less similar to
what I have red in your reply.
Also there was a comparative research of wave exposure (as an effective
fetch (complex calculations) and Baarseth index (relatively simple))
influence to Fucus vesiculosus fields. The result was that in most cases (in
the Baltic sea nearby Finland) correlation between these two exposure
estimates is around 0.98 (p<0.05). So it makes sense calculating Barseth
index as it is less complex...
The most interesting and still unsolved problem (for us) is calculating
Baarseth index for different depths and relief types. There were some
theorethical formulas, but coleagues divers checked them and proved that
they are practicaly unusable in a real world....

Best regards
Viktoras

>From: Quantitative Decisions <whuber@quantdec.com>
>To: "Viktoras Didziulis" <firekv@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: GISList: wave exposure calculations
>Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 09:39:35 -0400
>
>Dear Viktoras,
>At 11:01 AM 8/29/02 +0300, you wrote:
>>We wrote a script for Arc View to calculate effective fetch values for a
>>raster map of depths also taking into account prevailing wind directions,
>>etc. Well, it took 8 hours on our Pentium III computer to produce a
>>relatively small (around 1000x 1000) 2D raster map. As we are not
>>satisfied with such a "speed", we are rewriting the algorithm as a
>>stand-alone web based application. I would be interested in any open
>>source algorithms for routine wave exposure/effective fetch calculations
>>(if there are any). Thank's again for any information.
>
>I am appending a collection of messages that might be of some help. They
>outline a technique that I believe can be used to calculate fetch in a
>matter of minutes with ArcView. Everything can be prototyped with Map
>Calculator expressions.
>
>--Bill Huber
>



_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com



To unsubscribe, write to gislist-unsubscribe@geocomm.com
________________________________________________________________________
GeoCommunity GeoBids - less than $1 per day!
Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

Setup a GeoCommunity Account and have access to
the GISDataDepot DRG & DOQQ Catalog
http://www.geocomm.com/login.php


Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group