Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: RE: GISList: Cost of GIS Data
Date:  11/18/2002 03:08:22 PM
From:  Robert Heitzman




>
> >> I've found in my dealings with beurocrats and their GIS data,
> >> they are really hesitant to give it to anyone in the private sector.
> >> I hazard to guess it's becasue they don't want anyone to find their
> >> mistakes and try to hold them accountable.
>
>No, the reason for not GIVING it to private sector for free is because
>many of them will turn around and try to resell it at a profit.

Very anti-capitalist of you. Is there some kind of unpardonable sin in
offering public domain data for sale? If so most GIS data vendors are going
to some very uncomfortable place in the afterlife. Certainly packaging,
convenience, and enhanced data are all saleable items. What business is it
of yours that this event takes place? Perhaps greed is not limited to
capitalists?

>When our GIS data contains outdated or missing information it is almost
>always because no one has provided any funding for that update work to
>happen. In our state, the legislature mandates that our agency maintain
>the Corporate GIS Database, yet they conveniently keep forgetting to
>allocate us ANY operating budget money whatsoever.
>
>Try having to operate like a private business while still being hamstrung
>by all the various government rules, like NOT being able to actually
>compete with the private sector on RFP's. It's extremely hard
>just to make ends meet, let alone keep 100+ data layers current
>at all times AND give them away for free to the private sector.

In the private sector this is called the cost of doing business. Unfunded
mandates and burdensome government rules are a way of life for those under
jurisdictions. What's good the goose...

>
>We'd like nothing better than to be able to afford to keep all
>the layers current and allow anyone who wants to download them for
>free, but guess what - that takes a huge budget we just don't have.

That's a great excuse. Is it allowed on your State Income Tax/Sales
Tax/Excise Tax/Fees/Permits/Inspections/Licensing/ etc. forms? I can see
this very useful checkbox - Don't have it, sorry!

>
>http://www.cgia.state.nc.us/cost.html

The charges outlined on these page are outrageous IMHO. Assuming you already
are required to develop the layers in question (as you appear to be by the
statements above) the incremental cost of delivering the next electronic
copy should be "too cheap to meter" and should be free to download. Granted
there should be mechanisms for any special requests for developing or
enhancing GIS data. But data that is "base map" related (Streets,
boundaries, elevations, etc.) should always be free IMO. Any pulic domain
data developed outside your agency (Like DOQQs, etc.) should certainly be
free and be provided as a service to your public.

Glenn's point of it not being inexpensive to serve up data is valid to some
extent. But once the infrastructure (backbone resident server with adequate
server capacity, something the state is probably already doing for other web
based services) is there for a statewide operation the ongoing cost should
be insignificant.

It is interesting to see on your data pages that your are offering for sale
public domain data from other agencies and jurisdictions - how capitalist of
you!

It appears to me you are just running a little business by maintaining a
chokepoint on GIS data that has already been mandated to be developed. Is
that really appropriate for a taxpayer funded agency?


_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail



To unsubscribe, write to gislist-unsubscribe@geocomm.com
________________________________________________________________________
GeoCommunity GeoBids - less than $1 per day!
Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

Setup a GeoCommunity Account and have access to
the GISDataDepot DRG & DOQQ Catalog
http://www.geocomm.com/login.php


Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group