Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: Re: GISList: Microsoft SQL Server Vs Oracle Spatial9i
Date:  12/10/2002 03:16:05 AM
From:  Mark Prins



Citeren Raghavendran <srg@immcoinc.com>:

> Dear Geo Community:
>
> I am in the process of migrating data associated with utilities
into a
> GIS
> platform.
>
> The utility data is so dynamic in nature that we decided to go
for a
> database to store them like Oracle Spatial, Microsoft SQL
Server etc.
>
> But I am in fix as to deciding on the pros and cons of going
after each
> system.
>

Note that you are talking about two entirely different solutions
here. One being an enterprise class spatially enabled relational
database (oracle spatial) the other a sub-enterprise class
regular relational database. It would make more sens if you
compared spatially enabled databases (oracle spatial,
postGIS, ...).

The regular spatial database will allow you to store spatial data
in a vendor specific (closed) manner - generally as a BLOB
(optianally using a middleware such as SDE) while afore mentioned
spatial databases implement the open OGC standards: thus not
locking you down to a specific desktop GIS or middleware database
extension.

Also there is nothing wrong with file based storage if you can do
without multi-user read/write access to the dataset.

Mark


-
Mark C. Prins
Spatial Fusion Specialist
______________________________________________________

CARIS Geographic Informations Systems BV
CARIS BV Support: support@caris.nl
CARIS BV Marketing/Sales: sales@caris.nl
tel. +31413296010
fax. +31413296012
WWW Marine: http://www.caris.nl
WWW Spatial Components : http://www.spatialcomponents.com
Mgr. van Oorschotstraat 13, 5473 AX Heeswijk
PO.box 47, 5473 ZG HEESWIJK-DINTHER
the Netherlands
_____________________________________________________________________

Zon Breedband Family, 2 keer zo snel als alle andere ADSL aanbieders.
Voor maar 34 euro per maand.
Bestel nu op www.zonnet.nl/breedband en krijg het modem gratis.




To unsubscribe, write to gislist-unsubscribe@geocomm.com
________________________________________________________________________
GeoCommunity GeoBids - less than $1 per day!
Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

Setup a GeoCommunity Account and have access to
the GISDataDepot DRG & DOQQ Catalog
http://www.geocomm.com/login.php


Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group