Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: RE: GISList: RE: OGC and Standards, - a response
Date:  12/11/2002 09:24:07 PM
From:  Anthony Quartararo



Carl,

Why was OGC needed in the first place ? It would appear the key players
(the fab five...) could have hashed this all out a decade ago. In OGC's
own FAQ under "Why is OGC necessary?", it states that it [OGC] "brings
together the key players and provides a formal structure for achieving
consensus on the common interfaces." So, if an organization is not part
of OGC, it is not a key player, and to follow, the consensus (a perilous
strategy) is only from those key players? Wasn't it Henry Ford who once
said, "you can have any color as long as it is black." We can choose
whichever specification we want, as long as it's OGC's ?


"We rely on an technology infrastructure framework (http, XML, XSLT,
ebRIM,
etc) that is provided by other organizations. But are the problems they
are trying to solve orders of magnitude more complex? I am not so sure
about that. I like to quote something attributed to Albert Einstein: "As
a young man, my fondest dream was to become a Geographer. However, while
working in the Patent Office, I thought deeply about the matter and
concluded that it was far too difficult a subject. With some reluctance,
I then turned to Physics as a substitute." Trying to solve semantic
interoperability issues in the geospatial domain is very complex."

I'm not diminishing the complexity of fundamental geographic problems
(no one has yet to figure out how to make a perfect map of the globe), I
am simply stating that deciding on changes to the very fabric of the
internet has incredibly large ramifications across all domains,
countries, industries, products, etc. that leverage that technology.
Deciding how AutoCAD passes a representation of an electric circuit
diagram to Oracle, to be represented in an ArcIMS website is not on the
same order of complexity (granted, that's a simplified example).

Anthony




To unsubscribe, write to gislist-unsubscribe@geocomm.com
________________________________________________________________________
GeoCommunity GeoBids - less than $1 per day!
Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

Setup a GeoCommunity Account and have access to
the GISDataDepot DRG & DOQQ Catalog
http://www.geocomm.com/login.php


Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group