Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: RE: GISList: RE: OGC and Standards, - a response
Date:  12/11/2002 09:36:13 PM
From:  Anthony Quartararo



Frank,

"and gives me a greater opportunity to provide software components and
interoperability technology to my user base without just being tied down
to one proprietary vendors architecture."

It's still proprietary software no matter what you are buying, just
because you can now manipulate (through an interface [intermediary] )
ArcInfo with Oracle, etc. Etc. over the web does not mean you have
escaped anyone's proprietary architecture.

"One thing I will suggest is that I think it is important for more user
organizations to take a driving role at OGC. As far as driving the
agenda at OGC, I think a variety of American federal agencies (military
and civilian) have had the largest role, and acted on behalf of the user
community as they see it. And I think that is very helpful, as opposed
to leaving things totally in the hands of the software vendors
themselves."

I couldn't disagree more. I'm no rubber stamp cheerleader for the big
vendors, and I am not anti-USGS, etc. although they have their moments,
but hands down, the private/public vendors ability to adjust and absorb
market conditions, changes, etc. is far more capable that federal
organizations. This is not disparaging to the fundamental contributions
those federal organizations have and continue to make, it's a matter of
priorities and core mission. To say that they have had the largest role
and have acted on behalf of the user community, that's an unsettling
thought, true or otherwise.


Anthony




To unsubscribe, write to gislist-unsubscribe@geocomm.com
________________________________________________________________________
GeoCommunity GeoBids - less than $1 per day!
Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

Setup a GeoCommunity Account and have access to
the GISDataDepot DRG & DOQQ Catalog
http://www.geocomm.com/login.php


Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group