Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: Re: GISList: GIS P2P - * Market Research Question *
Date:  01/20/2003 08:21:52 PM
From:  Robert Heitzman




>The lack of metadata in most standard files. In the music case, two things
>worked in favour of Napster: file names and MP3 ID tags provided just
>enough metadata to allow for a reasonable search. With GIS files, assuming
>the people have not filled in any metadata "helper" files like the new
>ArcGIS XML files, the most info you can get would be file name and spatial
>extent.
>
>I still think it could be useful though. The sheer usefulness of simple FTP
>"archive" sites inside organizations indicates to me that an easy-to-setup
>and globally published (via the napster central directory) system would be
>an order-of-magnitude more useful.
>

Ditto Paul's points.

Folks should be requried to post minimal metadata in order to register their
data.

I assume the model is the directory is centrally located but the actual data
is dispersed to various download points on the internet. Some QOS minimum
should be required to stay registered and those who fail to provide a useful
download point should have their ercords renmoved or flagged as less than
useful.

Hard to say were the revenue would come from for the host. Perhaps charging
folks to register any significant amount of data would be one source.
Providing an ftp site for rent to store the data another. I would suppose
lots of small providers would not have a good way to have a public internet
ftp site.

Something that may be a nice feature to sell is a way for an organization to
provide a view of the stored files that is limited to their data. Not to
exclude others but to provide a well organized public face to their data.
This may allow small jurisdictions (Cites/Counties/etc.) a cheap way to get
a public GIS download presence. Something akin to the google.com search
limited to one newsgroup.

BTW I think this model was proposed by Dimitri Rtow of Manifold.net a long
time ago as a solution for distibution of public domian data.

_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM: Try the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail



To unsubscribe, write to gislist-unsubscribe@geocomm.com
________________________________________________________________________
GeoCommunity GeoBids - less than $1 per day!
Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

Setup a GeoCommunity Account and have access to
the GISDataDepot DRG & DOQQ Catalog
http://www.geocomm.com/login.php


Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group