Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: RE: GISList: Re: GIS P2P * Market Research Question *
Date:  01/24/2003 04:12:02 PM
From:  J Bee



Sorry Charlie, but that ain't a simple fact.

You want freedom of expression, but you want it to be
how you like it, something you find worthy. That's
not really freedom now is it.

To call ateention to a list members obvious selling
tactics is nothing to be ashamed of - or quiet about.
My opion is that he is a blowhard, my facts are his
emails, and my arguement is for him to give us a
flippin break.

I'm sorry William if this causes you to open another
box of tissues...

Bob



--- William Howell <WHowell@mclaneenv.com> wrote:
> How I could wish this could end but I'd love it if
> all could understand
> a simple fact: make an argument or an opinion
> without attacking
> someone's character because of their opinion.
> Otherwise it is a flame.
> I encourage opinions, but if you really feel for
> insults because of
> differing opinions, go to bar.
>
> William L. Howell
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: J Bee [mailto:mapcmon@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 4:50 PM
> To: gislist@geocomm.com
> Subject: RE: GISList: Re: GIS P2P * Market Research
> Question *
>
>
> Dear Mr. Naive 2003,
>
> What, we're not professionals because we point out
> the
> truth, i.e., reality about Dimitri? And now you
> have
> thrown in your political correctness by accusing
> people with different opions as "flaming".
> CONGRATULTIONS!!! You have now also become Mr.
> Pathetic 2003!!!
>
> "Yes, Dimitri mention his software."
>
> Please, you could put a friggin string on the back
> of
> this guy, pull it, and get the same blah blah over
> and
> over. Who cares if his software is good (?) - there
> are several good (and better I might add) GIS
> oftware
> packages out there, but thankfully, no one else
> verbally tortures us the way he does. Hey, I know
> he
> has the right, but I also have the right to respond.
>
> If you don't like it, you get off the list!
>
> I guarantee we won't miss your naiveness nor your
> pathetic defense of Dimitri.
>
> Bob
>
>
> --- William Howell <WHowell@mclaneenv.com> wrote:
> > I guess even amongst so called professionals, a
> list
> > cannot be complete
> > without those that can only respond by "flaming"
> and
> > adding their always
> > impressive insults. I thank you, you add so very
> > much to the value of
> > the list.
> >
> > Yes, Dimitri mentions his software (a bit often).
> > So what? It's a good
> > piece of software and he wants people to know
> about
> > it. If it's really
> > too much for you to ignore the "ads" then
> > unsubscribe. I guarantee we
> > won't miss you're rare posts that only serve to
> > deride others.
> >
> > William L. Howell
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wunneburger, Douglas F.
> > [mailto:d-wunneburger@tamu.edu]
> > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 3:39 PM
> > To: William Howell: gislist@geocomm.com
> > Subject: Re: GISList: Re: GIS P2P * Market
> Research
> > Question *
> >
> >
> > I suggest you read again.
> >
> > To any moron who has read a tenth of the posts by
> > Dimitri,
> > "GIS software per seat now costs less than $250
> a
> > seat." = Manifold.
> >
> > Since, according to Dimitri, Manifold doesn't
> spend
> > much on marketing,
> > and judging by the amount of time he must spend on
> > his submissions,
> > apparently the GISList has become its de facto
> > marketing department.
> >
> > I see he mentioned "less than $300 a seat" later
> in
> > his post. We must
> > be due for a price increase.
> >
> > Douglas Wunneburger
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "William Howell" <WHowell@mclaneenv.com>
> > To: <gislist@geocomm.com>
> > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 2:02 PM
> > Subject: RE: GISList: Re: GIS P2P * Market
> Research
> > Question *
> >
> >
> > > That's funny I didn't see him mention anything
> > about Manifold. Yes,
> > > he loves it and so do many other people that
> have
> > made the switch or
> > > at least checked it out but he merely stated a
> > price cap (which
> > > happens to coincide). Some of us are a bit
> tired
> > of paying over a
> > > grand for a piece of software that won't get you
> > anywh

Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group