I have a solution to the Manifold 5.x vs. ArcGIS 8.x war! Everyone pitch in and buy me a copy and I'll review it for you! Its Friday!:)
----- Original Message ----- From: "PSTERLING" <PSTERLING@quinault.org> To: "J Bee" <mapcmon@yahoo.com>: "Jamie Snow" <jamieb_snow@yahoo.ca>: "Quantitative Decisions" <whuber@quantdec.com>: <gislist@geocomm.com> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM Subject: RE: GISList: Manifold 5.x vs. ArcGIS 8.x
> Exactly right, JBee, and it is Flaming Friday, so let's have some fun and not be so dang serious all the time. > > Paulster > If you can't stand the heat, get the heck off the manifold! > > PS I'm sorry that the above statement causes some email services to quarantine my message. > I inserted "the heck" to separate the "get" from the "off" to see if that was the trigger. Sometimes you just gotta laugh. Even GIS people. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: J Bee [mailto:mapcmon@yahoo.com] > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 8:45 AM > To: Jamie Snow: Quantitative Decisions: gislist@geocomm.com > Subject: Re: GISList: Manifold 5.x vs. ArcGIS 8.x > > > Jamie, > > I totally agree with you Jamie, and I thank you for > your willingness to speak up. I belive your email > spurred Bill Huber to write his posting which helped > to expose the false hold that the Manifold's post > (comparing ArcInfo with Manifold) contained. > > Following your intial response to the Manifold post, > however, Dimitri responded to you, accusing you of > "character assisination". But yet in this case, oh > no, Dimitiri wasn't "flaming" you. After Bill's > posting though, we see that your disclosure was > actually very productive. Again I thank you for that. > > I - and everyone else - knows that this list is an > excellent resource for solving many GIS questions. > However, it is also important to remind folks that > that freedom is speech is the reason we have such a > resource. When Dimnitri snakes in wth constant sales > references to his software, as if the world would not > survive without out it, people are going to call him > out and vent their frustrations. Cry babies can call > it "flaming" and filter people out, but doesn't that > just lead to an "I only want to hear what I only want > to hear" attitude? While many of us may not be able > to use big, obscure words from the English dictionary > like Dimitri and Bill use, our voices will still not > be squashed. > > Huber, towards the end of his posting stated how he is > filtering out people who have sent recent posts which > called out Dimitri. Yet he states further that, he > loves Dimitri's ramblings (with an included smiley > face), and won't filter him out. So, you can use the > list to heap praise on folks like Dimitri, but ya > can't send a post that disagrees? That's bull. > > If you want to filter people on this list, or drop off > the list, just do it. Otherwise, it seems the list > should promote the general exchange of all views - > even those of people who are sick of reading blatant > marketing spiels. I have never seen a rep from ESRI, > Caliper, Golden Software, etc., get on this list and > contantly refer people to their product. Yet Dimitri > acts like his software was sent from heaven, and we > are all fools for not using it. BULL! > > Anyway, I feel better now.... > > God bless America, and god bless GIS- > > Bob (The Accused Flamer) > > > --- Jamie Snow <jamieb_snow@yahoo.ca> wrote: > > Bill's post below is exactly what I was taking from > > the 'comparison' on Manifold's marketing site. I do > > know the person who wrote the original comparison, > > so > > that is what prompted my post. It was not a flame > > on > > the person himself ... just a question of his > > ability > > to adequately compare many GIS applications, with > > his > > few years experience. Although anyone can compare > > software, I thought that if a company is using this > > comparison as a marketing blurb, it should be from a > > more experienced user. > > > > Dmitri's statement of "Every truly experienced GIS > > person reading this list understands it is a far > > from > > trivial matter to learn how to operate in detail any > > one of these products, let alone to achieve a > > working > > mastery of three of them". I couldn't agree more. > > That is why I was questioning how much weight a > > comparison of products would ca
|