Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: RE: GISList: Working with large rasters ~100Gb and GIS
Date:  03/17/2003 10:17:20 AM
From:  Karen Morley



Hi Dimitri,

While I cannot discuss specifics of the case, defending patented
intellectual property is the right and responsibility of any company that
has invested as much as Lizardtech has into their underlying technology and
products. As a software developer, I find it surprising that protecting
your own IP that is integral to your products would be distasteful. This is
not like Amazon, claiming patents to every business process, these are real
mathematical algorithyms and methods that Lizardtech paid to license from
LANL.

Additionally, we have continued to move the technology forward in ways that
no competitors have yet done and intend to continue to do so.

I really don't know what you mean by eggregious and perhaps we can take that
discussion offline. The decode SDK is used by almost every GIS vendor on
the planet so I don't see how it could possible be that restrictive. Anyone
can freely distribute our browser plugins and the decode SDK requires a
signed license agreement, since we have reporting responsibilities to LANLit
does not involve royalties and there is a nominal fee to get into our
program (to cover administrative overhead) unless you opt for developer
support.. The encode SDK, of course, is not free and I can assure you that
you will also get a price tag from ERM to use their unlimited encode SDK as
well.

I hope this helps clear things up and if not, I welcome further dicussion
in an offline thread. That said, ew would be delighted for Manifold to
support the latest version of MrSID.

best regards,

-Karen



-----Original Message-----
From: Dimitri Rotow [mailto:dar@manifold.net]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 10:58 AM
To: gislist@geocomm.com
Subject: RE: GISList: Working with large rasters ~100Gb and GIS



>
> That statement was almost true before the last release of MrSID
> compression
> technology. Now MrSID has truly lossless compression at rations of 2:1-
> about 8:1 with numeric radiometric and geometric fidelity. It also has
> native support in nearly every major GIS package obviating the need for
> viewers or plugins. I won't do a commercial as that is not what this list
> is for but did want to clear that up. For more info go to
> www.lizardtech.com
>
>

Karen,

Is LizardTech still pursuing that unfortunate lawsuit against Earth
Resources? Like many software developers, that left a bad taste in our
mouth and is one of the reasons the most rapidly growing GIS package does
not support MrSID. I'm curious to hear if things have changed on the legal
front, and also whether LizardTech intends to reform the more egregiously
anticompetitive terms of the "free" MrSID license, to say, bring it more
into line with what is done by companies like Microsoft with its licensing
or Earth Resources with ERMapper/ECW. These would be positive steps in
building momentum to allow more companies to support MrSID in addition to
"open" alternatives. What's your take on all this?

Cheers,

Dimitri



To unsubscribe, write to gislist-unsubscribe@geocomm.com
________________________________________________________________________
GeoCommunity GeoBids - less than $1 per day!
Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

Online Archive of GISList (and numerous others) available at:
http://spatialnews.geocomm.com/community/lists/

Setup a GeoCommunity Account and have access to
the GISDataDepot DRG & DOQQ Catalog
http://www.geocomm.com/login.php


To unsubscribe, write to gislist-unsubscribe@geocomm.com
________________________________________________________________________
GeoCommunity GeoBids - less than $1 per day!
Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

Online Archive of GISList (and numerous others) available at:
http://spatialnews.geocomm.com/community/lists/

Setup a GeoCommunity Account and have access to
the GISDataDepot DRG & DOQQ Catalog
http://www.geocomm.com/login.php


Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group