Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: Re: GISList: Interior e-gov tack irks GIS vendors (Geospatial One-Stop initiative)
Date:  04/19/2003 11:25:01 AM
From:  Paul Ramsey




On Saturday, April 19, 2003, at 02:36 AM, Michael Gould wrote:

> At 12:43 18/04/2003 -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>> Dimitri Rotow wrote:
>>
>>> Let's try a thought experiment: suppose agencies really wanted to=20=20
>>> share
>>> data - why not use SDTS and simply put everything up for free=20=20
>>> download via
>>> FTP?
>>
>> Dmitri is right, the problem of GIS data sharing has alot more to do=20=
=20
>> with organizational intent than with technology. In many ways,=20=20
>> OpenGIS technology could make the problem worse, by convincing=20=20
>> organizations that they can have their cake and eat it too: provide=20=
=20
>> access to data via OGC interfaces without losing "control" over their=20=
=20
>> oh-so-precious data.
>
> Arrrrrrrrgh! You don't open the data (or your source code), you open=20=
=20
> the INTERFACES!!!!

That's exactly what I said. All I questioned was the uniform orthodoxy=20=
=20
that the end result of all this talk about open interfaces was actually=20=
=20
going to improve the overall ability of people to work with integrated=20=
=20
data. A cascaded WMS service (might) look pretty, but you cannot=20=20
answer many (any) analytical questions with it. If organizations=20=20
remain unwilling to provide access to actual data, it is irrelevant=20=20
whether they fail to provide access via WFS or fail to provide access=20=20
via an FTP site full of SDTS files. My point is that the technology is=20=
=20
not the hard part, yet it receives for more attention than the actual=20=20
problem, which is organizational intransigence. In some cases, it is=20=20
being substituted for solving the actual organizational problem ("aha,=20=
=20
we can 'publish' our data via WMS and then people can look at it=20=20
without actually touching it"). Is a half measure better than no=20=20
measure? It depends on whether the half-measure is relieving the=20=20
pressure to solve the whole problem.

Do you see?

Paul

>
>> The experience here in BC has certainly been instructive. On the one=20=
=20
>> hand, a government employee created a heirarchical FTP site and=20=20
>> placed as much licence-free BC data into has he could find, all in=20=20
>> the same format and projection (unfortunately the format was E00, but=20=
=20
>> c'est la vie). On the other hand an agency build a massive web portal=20=
=20
>> for ordering data (including the free stuff, which can be had for=20=20
>> free from the web site if you have the patience) for several million=20=
=20
>> dollars.
>>
>> I've used the portal zero times and the FTP site hundreds of time.
>>
>> However, that was the *last* ten years. The *next* ten years could be=20=
=20
>> vastly different, since theoretically the location of data will=20=20
>> become irrelevant as long as you can programatically discover and use=20=
=20
>> it via standard interfaces. Theoretically. :)
>>
>> --
>> __
>> /
>> | Paul Ramsey
>> | Refractions Research
>> | Email: pramsey@refractions.net
>> | Phone: (250) 885-0632
>> _
>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe, write to gislist-unsubscribe@geocomm.com
>> ______________________________________________________________________=
=20
>> __
>> GeoCommunity GeoBids - less than $1 per day!
>> Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
>> http://www.geobids.com
>>
>> Online Archive of GISList (and numerous others) available at:
>> http://spatialnews.geocomm.com/community/lists/
>>
>> Setup a GeoCommunity Account and have access to the GISDataDepot DRG=20=
=20
>> & DOQQ Catalog
>> http://www.geocomm.com/login.php
>>
>
> ----
> Michael Gould
> Depto. Lenguajes y Sistemas Inform=E1ticos
> (Information Systems Department)
> Universitat Jaume I
> E-12071 Castell=F3n (Spain)
> mailto:gould@lsi.uji.es
> http://www.mgould.com
> Vespucci summer school http://www.vespucci.org
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe, write to gislist-unsubscribe@geocomm.com
> _______________________________________________________________________=
=20
> _
> GeoCommunity GeoBids - less than $1 per day!
> Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
> http://www.geobids.com
>
> Online Archive of GISList (and numerous others) available at:
> http://spatialnews.geocomm.com/community/lists/
>
> Setup a GeoCommunity Account and have access to
> the GISDataDepot DRG & DOQQ Catalog
> http://www.geocomm.com/login.php
>
>
P

Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group