Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: Re: GISList: Interior e-gov tack irks GIS vendors
Date:  04/20/2003 11:15:00 PM
From:  Paul Ramsey




Amen, let the revolution begin. :)


On Sunday, April 20, 2003, at 07:53 AM, Michael Gould Carlson wrote:

> This message might bounce from the geocomm list (as I am on another
> mail
> account): please forward if it does not appear. Thanks. (Also, I will
> be off-
> line for the next few days...)
>
> Paul,
>
> We are in absolute agreement that the hard part is not the technology,
> rather
> the organisational or political part of an SDI.
>
> But since we are, generally speaking, tecnologists... :-) true,
> current WMS
> does not support analysis, wasn't supposed to. It is essentially a
> visualization engine for data which exist, and which one can locate via
> catalog services. Other specs such WebCoverage and Web Terrain Service
> allow
> some extra functionality...but the object is not to create a full
> blown GIS:
> not for now at least. The object is to serve the 80% of users who
> mainly want
> to find and visualize. once you've done that, and you see that the
> data is of
> value to you, then you connect somewhere and download gads of data for
> your
> desktop GIS, or, some day, also process it on-line via web services.
>
> Back to your comment: yes, it all blows up if public sector (mainly)
> data
> providers do not facilitate the base data and collaboration. And yes,
> that is
> not a technical problem. But we (our SDI group, and many other
> researchers)
> have been trying a simple experiment: put a running demo on the
> politician's
> doorstep, ring the doorbell, and run.
>
> Some will pay no attention, some will not know what it is, but then
> some will
> say, hey, this stuff is cool, and it works...when I search for my
> parish data
> appear. The, secondarily, they (sometimes) contact us and ask what can
> they do
> to make this small demo grow to be the real thing!!
>
> This experiment can be done with a single vendor solution, or with an
> open
> architecture showing how multi vendors can contribute various pieces
> to the
> puzzle. We prefer the latter, and the idea seems to be catching on.
> Sure,
> certain vendors are not going to like being only a minor player in the
> puzzle,
> but the idea that if the market gets fed up then they might be out in
> the
> cold, is something to consider.
>
> great discussion: hopefully after the Easter hlidays more people will
> pipe in.
>
> cheers,
> Mike Gould
>
>
> ------
>
> Delivered-To: gould@lsi.uji.es
> Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 09:22:03 -0700
> From: Paul Ramsey <pramsey@refractions.net>
> Subject: Re: GISList: Interior e-gov tack irks GIS vendors (Geospatial
> One-
> Stop
> initiative)
> To: Michael Gould <gould@lsi.uji.es>
> Cc: gislist@geocomm.com
> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552)
>
>
>> Arrrrrrrrgh! You don't open the data (or your source code), you open
> the INTERFACES!!!!
>
>
> That's exactly what I said. All I questioned was the uniform orthodoxy
> that the end result of all this talk about open interfaces was actually
> going to improve the overall ability of people to work with integrated
> data. A cascaded WMS service (might) look pretty, but you cannot
> answer many (any) analytical questions with it. If organizations
> remain unwilling to provide access to actual data, it is irrelevant
> whether they fail to provide access via WFS or fail to provide access
> via an FTP site full of SDTS files. My point is that the technology is
> not the hard part, yet it receives for more attention than the actual
> problem, which is organizational intransigence. In some cases, it is
> being substituted for solving the actual organizational problem ("aha,
> we can 'publish' our data via WMS and then people can look at it
> without actually touching it"). Is a half measure better than no
> measure? It depends on whether the half-measure is relieving the
> pressure to solve the whole problem.
>
>
> Do you see?
>
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
>
Paul Ramsey
Refractions Research
Email: pramsey@refractions.net
Phone: (250) 885-0632



To unsubscribe, write to gislist-unsubscribe@geocomm.com
________________________________________________________________________
GeoCommunity GeoBids - less than $1 per day!
Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

Online Archive of GISList (and numerous others) available at:
http://spatialnews.geocomm.com/community/lists/

Setup a GeoCommunity Account and have access to
the GISDataDepot DRG & DOQQ Catalog
http://www.geocomm.com/login.php


Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group