Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: GISList: Re: Effective Standards
Date:  04/24/2003 04:55:01 PM
From:  Paul Ramsey



Dimitri Rotow wrote:
>> Sure it is. Standards take incredibly much longer to establish than
>> anyone would consider reasonable from a technical point of view.
>> There is such
>
> I'd disagree. Standards that are effective and make sense take off
> like wildfire - look at the use of mp3's to swap music, for example.
> On the other hand, I would agree with you that bloated, inefficient
> standards that make life difficult for users and serve only to
> protect the commercial interests of legacy vendors do take incredibly
> much longer to establish.

Interesting point, per usual. And an interesting example. In the recent
era, it might be argued that standards which are accompanied by an open
source reference implementation take off extremely quickly. Where would
XML be without the early availability of Expat? Where would MP3 be
without the ISO reference source code? Provide an open source
programmatic interface to the standard capabilities you want to provide
and you are off to the races. I don't care about the Java RMI wire
protocol language, because I can just call RMI functions. I don't care
about the Oracle SQL*Net protocol because I can just call C functions.
If OpenGIS wrote a binary client/server specification that included a
BSD-licensed reference implementation library it would be immediately
(a) useful and (b) used. All this hooey about XML/GML being "human
readable" is irrelevant in the presence of a useable (and implemented)
API. If you leave the implentation of things solely to vendors they will
botch it up (accidentally or on purpose), and defeat your aims.

--
__
/
| Paul Ramsey
| Refractions Research
| Email: pramsey@refractions.net
| Phone: (250) 885-0632
_



To unsubscribe, write to gislist-unsubscribe@geocomm.com
________________________________________________________________________
GeoCommunity GeoBids - less than $1 per day!
Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

Online Archive of GISList (and numerous others) available at:
http://spatialnews.geocomm.com/community/lists/

Setup a GeoCommunity Account and have access to
the GISDataDepot DRG & DOQQ Catalog
http://www.geocomm.com/login.php


Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group