Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: Re: GISList: Regional GIS
Date:  06/09/2003 07:55:01 PM
From:  evillige .. gmu.edu



The most appropriate solution depends on the orientation of your states. Are they more north south running (in which case using the UTM projection will be most accurate) or are they more east/west oriented ( in which cas the conic projections Albers or Lambert are most appropriate). If they are fairly compact than it is a toss-up

EV

----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Ramsey <pramsey@refractions.net>
Date: Monday, June 9, 2003 8:41 pm
Subject: Re: GISList: Regional GIS

> What are you going to *do* with the data, is the determining
> question.
> Simply using the central UTM zone is the most convenient solution.
>
> However you will get distortions in distance and area measurements
>
> outside the bounds of the actual chosen zone. If you aren't doing
> any
> spatial analysis of distances or areas, then you are home free. If
> you
> are doing analysis, you might want to simply use your own
> projection, a
> custom parameterization of a standard projection like Albers Equal
> Area
> or Lambert Conformal Conic. Put your origin at the middle, your
> standard parallels around the top and bottom and supply some
> offsets to
> keep everything positive. Voila, instant projection! You will also
> get
> the best analytical results this way. The downside is that people
> tend
> to be bound to particular systems and often find arbitrary
> parameterizations confusing.
>
> On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 04:01 PM, epoulsen wrote:
>
> > Hello all!
> >
> > I am looking for some ideas on projections for a regional
> system. I am
> > looking to develop a regional data set that would encompass
> several
> > states
> > in the North East. I'd like to have the data from the states
> operate
> > as
> > seamless layers. I understand that the majority of governmental
>
> > agencies
> > prefer the state plane coordinate system for state data, but
> this will
> > not
> > work for seamless layers. I am leaning towards using UTM and
> while the
> > states are located within 3, I am leaning to using the zone in
> the
> > center
> > which encompasses the vast majority of the area.
> >
> > I was looking for your thoughts and especially any other
> examples of
> > regional systems over several states and how the projection
> issue was
> > handled.
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe, write to gislist-unsubscribe@geocomm.com
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > _
> > GeoCommunity GeoBids - less than $1 per day!
> > Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
> > http://www.geobids.com
> >
> > Online Archive of GISList (and numerous others) available at:
> > http://spatialnews.geocomm.com/community/lists/
> >
> > Setup a GeoCommunity Account and have access to
> > the GISDataDepot DRG & DOQQ Catalog
> > http://www.geocomm.com/login.php
> >
> >
> Paul Ramsey
> Refractions Research
> Email: pramsey@refractions.net
> Phone: (250) 885-0632
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe, write to gislist-unsubscribe@geocomm.com
> ________________________________________________________________________
> GeoCommunity GeoBids - less than $1 per day!
> Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
> http://www.geobids.com
>
> Online Archive of GISList (and numerous others) available at:
> http://spatialnews.geocomm.com/community/lists/
>
> Setup a GeoCommunity Account and have access to
> the GISDataDepot DRG & DOQQ Catalog
> http://www.geocomm.com/login.php
>
>
>



To unsubscribe, write to gislist-unsubscribe@geocomm.com
________________________________________________________________________
GeoCommunity GeoBids - less than $1 per day!
Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

Online Archive of GISList (and numerous others) available at:
http://spatialnews.geocomm.com/community/lists/

Setup a GeoCommunity Account and have access to
the GISDataDepot DRG & DOQQ Catalog
http://www.geocomm.com/login.php


Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group