Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: RE: [gislist] Seeking Opinions on Lizardtech's MrSID
Date:  11/07/2003 03:05:00 PM
From:  Dimitri Rotow




>
> Why is ECW the only choice? Wouldn't moving to another vendor
> implementation of wavelet compression put users at risk again?
>
> Why not JPEG200 (JP2), which is based on an ISO standard? Leica/Erdas is
> supporting JP2 and Mapping Science has put out GeoJP2.
>

Good points, but I think ECW is still a really open way to go. ERMapper's
making source code available is a very strong, confident move that shows
they are not afraid of opening ECW to developers, source code and all.
Plus, their support for JP2 within the SDK shows they are not afraid of
giving people an open choice of whatever they want to use in a "can't lose"
proposition. It's hard to think up a better alternative than having your
cake and eating it too.

Could it be that in the future JP2 will emerge as a preferred standard?
Well, maybe. But until then there is lots of image work to be done that
needs very robust, highly evolved, highly reliable code and if you are a
developer who needs to guarantee to his customers an advanced, proven
solution that is today well supported throughout the industry and already
integrated with image web servers, it makes sense to go with ECW, which has
a rock-solid code base. If that is displaced in the future by something
else, fine - we can all use it to our advantage.

By the way, I don't have any financial interest in this other than wanting
to see a good, open format for our users and wanting to avoid the
engineering expense of re-inventing the wheel.

Cheers,

Dimitri

_______________________________________________
gislist mailing list
gislist@lists.geocomm.com
http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist

_________________________________
This list is brought to you by
The GeoCommunity
http://www.geocomm.com/

Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group