Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: [gislist] calculate change in cropland for Missouri
Date:  02/12/2004 12:30:01 PM
From:  True, Cynthia D.



We would very much like to calculate change in cropland for Missouri.
Right now all we have is the county summaries from NRCS. When we
overlay crop change with our other grids, we get some strange looking
output, due to the hard boundaries at the county lines. My boss came up
with an idea to "improve" the look of the outcome.


How does this sound:

- calculate total acres lost or gained in cropland,
- assign that value to the centroid of each county, and rank 1 to 5 in
terms of acres lost to cropland
- create a surface from the centroids, thus getting rid of the county
boundaries -- this will give the surface a smooth look, at least

The question is: will the result be less valid versus assigning values
to the counties? If not, the we might as well do this to get rid of
those hard county boundary lines.


Is this any worse than assigning one value for the whole county when it
obviously varies depending on where you are in the county? Would we be
better off getting LUDU or GIRAS and comparing that to NLCD to get
change in cropland? Either way has some serious shortfalls, but what
else is there? I am interested in hearing your opinion.

Thanks for the help,
dt


C. Diane True
Missouri Resource Assessment Partnership
http://www.cerc.usgs.gov/morap/=20
(USA voice) 573-441-2794

"For if one link in nature's chain might be lost, another might be
lost, until the whole of things vanishes by piecemeal."
- Thomas Jefferson


_______________________________________________
gislist mailing list
gislist@lists.geocomm.com
http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist

_________________________________
This list is brought to you by
The GeoCommunity
http://www.geocomm.com/

Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group