Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: [gislist] Orthoimagery
Date:  05/07/2004 01:55:01 PM
From:  Eric Sandoval



Hello Listers:

I have a question for the orthoimagery experts out there. We have imagery that exhibits substantial radiometric inconsistencies. Our imagery was flown at 1:400 scale or 6 inch resolution. The various flight lines were merged and then were processed to choose the best image based on sun angle, clarity,etc. The images were then color balanced.

Our problem: Along the seems of our imagery a distinct difference can be seen. On one side of the seem the ground features will appear clear and on the other side they appear fuzzy. We were told by the survey company that these differences were the result of different flight lines. The difference in contrast, clarity and sharpness are a function of flight lines were taken at different times of the day and the position of the features. Some features are on the outer portion of the flight line and therefore exhibit lean due to camera angle. Flight lines were planned with a standard 60/30 overlap.

My question: Can't these problems be resolved through processing or surveying additional flight lines? I understand it's unreasonable to acquire additional flight lines after the initial survey (cost prohibitive), but couldn't additional flight lines been planned if these problems were known in advance (which they were)? Does this type of problem occur in all orthoimagery?

Any insight or comments that you can provide would be most appreciated.

Thank you,

-Eric Sandoval



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
_______________________________________________
gislist mailing list
gislist@lists.geocomm.com
http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist

_________________________________
This list is brought to you by
The GeoCommunity
http://www.geocomm.com/

Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group