Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: Re: [gislist] Spatial Data Distribution and National Security
Date:  05/14/2004 01:10:01 AM
From:  Michael Gould



Ron, It would certainly be a driver for IT consultants who would then build=
=20
the new SDIs :-) your scenario is a good one although it goes against one=
=20
of the basic SDI rules (in Europe at least): the infrastructure should try=
=20
to connect what already exists rather than have everyone redo the data=20
(which mapping agencies would love) they hold

Then again, teaching people the possible future benefits accrued by=20
standardization for future data collection (application schemas) makes good=
=20
sense. (I think this is happening: I see some migration to XML-everything,=
=20
including GML.)

Your proposal in any case is a concrete one, rather than RAND's 237-page=20
(non)conclusion that perhaps federal GI-related agencies should look at the=
=20
security issue. How many millions$ did it take to come up with that?

M Gould


At 00:21 14/05/2004, Ron Lake wrote:


snip---



>Hi,
>
>You could look at it from another perspective. In order to control GI=20
>information - you need standards - it is much harder to control otherwise=
=20
>- if ALL GI Data were GML and all transactions WFS transactions - then one=
=20
>could create policies (XACML) and access control requests (SAML) to=20
>regulate use of the data - then use XML Signatures for the really=20
>sensitive stuff - maybe if you flip it on its ear this is a big driver for=
=20
>SDI !!
>
>Cheers
>
>Ron
>_______________________________________________
>gislist mailing list
>gislist@lists.geocomm.com
>http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist
>
>_________________________________
>This list is brought to you by
>The GeoCommunity
>http://www.geocomm.com/
>
>Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
>http://www.geobids.com

-----------------------
Michael Gould
Dept. Information Systems
(Lenguajes y Sistemas Inform=E1ticos)
Universitat Jaume I
E-12071 Castell=F3n, Spain
mailto:gould@lsi.uji.es
GIM'04 workshop http://gim04.unizar.es
2nd Vespucci Summer School www.vespucci.org




_______________________________________________
gislist mailing list
gislist@lists.geocomm.com
http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist

_________________________________
This list is brought to you by
The GeoCommunity
http://www.geocomm.com/

Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group