Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: Re: [gislist] ArcGIS 9 - recommend postponing installation
Date:  06/01/2004 11:05:01 AM
From:  Martin du Saire



Since the question of alternatives to ESRI has come up... I recently
dabbled in GIS for a month or two using GRASS5.0, mainly because I was
working on a one-time mini project (nothing particularly sophisticated),
and it didn't make sense to invest in Arc-something at the time.

What does the GIS community think of GRASS? Is it worth the steep learning
curve or should I scrap it and go ESRI, the next time I need some maps?

Just wondering.

Martin

At 08:44 AM 6/1/2004 -0700, you wrote:
>
>On the flip side, you would also like to think thaqt users such as
>yourself would realize that there are far better alternatives, with more
>advanced technologies, easier to use, and much, much cheaper in cost. I
>am still bewildered as to why folks invest in ESRI, other than an excuse
>like "that's what everyone else seems to use"
>
>Well, before the next person jusmps off a cliff, consider Maptitude ($495
>which includes a geocoder) or TransCad (base TransCAD is $2,995 and far
>exceed the power of Arc whateverer...). Heck, even at the risk of waking
>the dead, there's Manifold at something like $300 (which does not include
>a geocoder). Not to mention several other GIS packages.
>
>Comparing ESRI to Microsoft is a misnomer. Very few options for PC
>operating systems. Quite a few options for GIS software.
>
>I dunno, maybe folks just enjoy standing over a toilet, watching their
>money go down the drain...
>
>Bob

_______________________________________________
gislist mailing list
gislist@lists.geocomm.com
http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist

_________________________________
This list is brought to you by
The GeoCommunity
http://www.geocomm.com/

Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group