Since the question of alternatives to ESRI has come up... I recently dabbled in GIS for a month or two using GRASS5.0, mainly because I was working on a one-time mini project (nothing particularly sophisticated), and it didn't make sense to invest in Arc-something at the time.
What does the GIS community think of GRASS? Is it worth the steep learning curve or should I scrap it and go ESRI, the next time I need some maps?
Just wondering.
Martin
At 08:44 AM 6/1/2004 -0700, you wrote: > >On the flip side, you would also like to think thaqt users such as >yourself would realize that there are far better alternatives, with more >advanced technologies, easier to use, and much, much cheaper in cost. I >am still bewildered as to why folks invest in ESRI, other than an excuse >like "that's what everyone else seems to use" > >Well, before the next person jusmps off a cliff, consider Maptitude ($495 >which includes a geocoder) or TransCad (base TransCAD is $2,995 and far >exceed the power of Arc whateverer...). Heck, even at the risk of waking >the dead, there's Manifold at something like $300 (which does not include >a geocoder). Not to mention several other GIS packages. > >Comparing ESRI to Microsoft is a misnomer. Very few options for PC >operating systems. Quite a few options for GIS software. > >I dunno, maybe folks just enjoy standing over a toilet, watching their >money go down the drain... > >Bob
_______________________________________________ gislist mailing list gislist@lists.geocomm.com http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist
_________________________________ This list is brought to you by The GeoCommunity http://www.geocomm.com/
Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids http://www.geobids.com
|