Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: RE: Alternatives (was: [gislist] ArcGIS 9 - recommendpostponinginstallation)
Date:  06/01/2004 03:10:01 PM
From:  Sonny Parafina



When compiled it does become machine code. High level languages allow
developers to write that can be compiled across multiple target
architectures instead of coding just for one. If your architecture is
constrained for a specific device/processor then it becomes practical.

GRC writes its software in assembly because their utilities deal with
relatively low level operations, this makes sense for what they are doing.
However, writing a more "generic" or user customizable program such as a GIS
would not be cost effective in terms of writing for each and every hardware
architecture.

sonny



-----Original Message-----
From: gislist-bounces@lists.thinkburst.com
[mailto:gislist-bounces@lists.thinkburst.com]On Behalf Of Anthony
Quartararo
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 11:56 AM
To: gislist@lists.thinkburst.com
Subject: RE: Alternatives (was: [gislist] ArcGIS 9 -
recommendpostponinginstallation)


On a related tangent, I think, and not being a programmer, a big "your
welcome" for any knee-slapping laughs this questions generates, but why/why
aren't GIS applications developed in machine/assembly language ? I
frequently visit www.grc.com for nifty tools, and have always been impressed
with their technical resources, and they exclusively use machine language to
keep things fast. Granted, their applications are very focused and
single-tasked, but why couldn't that development model be scaled to
something as robust as a full GIS ? Ok, when you recover fully from the
laughter, you can let me know....

Anthony


_______________________________________________
gislist mailing list
gislist@lists.geocomm.com
http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist

_________________________________
This list is brought to you by
The GeoCommunity
http://www.geocomm.com/

Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

_______________________________________________
gislist mailing list
gislist@lists.geocomm.com
http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist

_________________________________
This list is brought to you by
The GeoCommunity
http://www.geocomm.com/

Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group