Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: Re: [gislist] ArcGIS 9 - recommend postponing installation
Date:  06/01/2004 04:10:01 PM
From:  Brian Russo



At Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 04:42:08PM -0400, Ross, Gregory K. wrote:
> I think any organization that has Visual Basic (or VBA) familiar programmers
> or casual users would argue with you on the 'efficient' point of ESRI
> software. Only other GIS software that can come close to competing in
> efficient automation would be some Java based programs...........However,
> I'll bet there are more Visual Basic (or VBA) familiar users out there than
> Java familiar users......Not to mention that ESRI ArcGIS Engine provides
> application programming interfaces (APIs) for COM, .NET, Java, and C++.

Most/all of the major packages out there have most/all of these APIs..
Intergraph, Autodesk, MapInfo, Manifold.. I'm probably missing something
as I've not used these packages enough to guage their quality in this
regard.. However I'd prefer to avoid developing a nitpicky
buzzword-compliancy debate.. Suffice to say that having APIs for common
languages like C++ and .NET is by no means uniquely ESRI.

> ESRI products do not perform what exactly?

Encountering ludicrous bugs such as adjusting the curvature of a
neatline and watching annotations disappear have made me very jaded as
to the quality of their software.. Perhaps the most amusing bugs are
when their forms controls disappear or are misaligned.

Maybe if our ArcInfo license can ever actually process reasonably sized
datasets without dying then I will become less cynical of the matter.

> Automation is the key to efficient software workflow. If you can't automate
> the process, that means it is high in "user time" and demands rather
> specific tasks that are not even close to being efficient no matter what
> software you use. Software is simply a means of automating tasks........

Agreed, but this is not uniquely a feature of ESRI's products.

cheers,
- bri

--
Recursivity. Call back if it happens again.

_______________________________________________
gislist mailing list
gislist@lists.geocomm.com
http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist

_________________________________
This list is brought to you by
The GeoCommunity
http://www.geocomm.com/

Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group