Amen to that. Perhaps if that were the *only* area that were certified [software engineers] in our industry, the rest of us would lose a ton of *excuses* ["ah, it's the software sir"], but we would be equally freed-up to truly excel instead of spending so much time scratching a whole in our heads...
By no means am I suggesting any of the big ISVs seek ISO 9001 certification....please....however, conforming to the SEI CMM Level 5 might be a nice start....
Anthony
> -----Original Message----- > From: gislist-bounces@lists.geocomm.com > [mailto:gislist-bounces@lists.geocomm.com] On Behalf Of Brian Russo > Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 6:15 PM > To: Miller, Harold > Cc: gislist@lists.geocomm.com > Subject: Re: [gislist] GIS Certification? > > We really should be certifying software as well then.. > > > At Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 02:30:06PM -0400, Miller, Harold wrote: > > Like many things in life, we all have an opinion. Short of > making one > > feel good about their accomplishments, a Certification will > only mean > > as much as the industry will allow. I think legislating it for the > > sake of it has no positive value. As a GIS Professional > working in an > > Engineering firm, I see the value of professional > certification. Its > > borne out of liability and accountability. That is to say > that if an > > engineer designs something that fails and harm is caused, then as a > > certified professional, and the only one who could > authorize its design, liability for the failure has a source. > > > > As a GIS professional for the better part of 20 years, I > have worked > > on numerous projects, in numerous situations. Some have involved > > authorizing / signing off on design aspects for GIS > systems. Some have > > done better than others, but I have never as a GIS > professional been > > in a legal liability situation similar to a doctor, lawyer, > engineer or even licensed surveyor. > > That is not to say that it can't happen or hasn't happened. > > > > I am supportive of a Certification process that has real > purpose and > > engenders real forwarding of the science or practice. But, > as GIS as a > > supporting discipline or business becomes a commodity, it > becomes less > > justifiable. GIS is more about intelligent data management > in support > > of other businesses and practices - i.e. Engineering, Environment, > > Land Management, etc.. > > > > There will always need to be a core of pure GIS specialists to > > continue to move the science and related technology forward > and maybe > > that is where a certification discussion or option can be focused - > > Just my 2 cents (sorry > > 2.7 Canadian) > > > > Harold > > > > > > Harold S. Miller > > Conestoga-Rovers & Associates > > eSolutions Group > > 228 Matheson Blvd. E., > > Mississauga, Ont., L4Z 1X1 > > Phone: (905) 712-0510 > > Fax: (905) 712-0515 > > Cell: (519) 835-7366 > > email to: hmiller@craworld.com > > web: http://www.CRAworld.com > > > > It is the foolish hiring manager that relies on what is > printed on the > > CV as a basis to hire someone. The smart hiring manager > will do a lot > > of due diligence, going well beyond the ad-hoc call to a > > "professional" or personal reference. After all, who puts a person > > down as a reference that will not say glowing positive things about > > the candidate in question ? We need a certification to > "guarantee" someone has the experience they claim, come on, > > that's a lazy way to make a decision about someone. And > to boot, even if > > everyone started requiring certifications, and everyone got > them, what > > would the real net be for the industry and profession? So much for > > any uniqueness eh ? It's a novelty folks, like WAP and > checking stock > > quotes on your mobile phone, it will pass away and find the > round file in the sky too..... > > > > Anthony > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: gislist-bounces@lists.geocomm.com > > > [mailto:gislist-bounces@lists.geocomm.com] On Behalf Of > Marc Allred > > > Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 12:45 PM > > > To: gislist@lists.geocomm.com > > > Subject: RE: [gislist] GIS Certification? > > > > > > Chris, > > > You hit it right on the noggin. If the public and > private sector > > > take the GISP certified individual over the one without the
|