Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: RE: [gislist] Shapefiles & Geodatabases
Date:  07/23/2004 01:25:01 PM
From:  Ross, Gregory K.



Anthony,

The real issue becomes how large is your data? A personal geodatabase can
hold up to 2GB of data, and if you are able to get all of your data into a
personal geodatabase, then the processing time to merge your "sheets" MAY BE
reduced. If you're your data is larger than 2GB you may need to go to and
SDE type database.

Gregory Ross
University of Florida

-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Quartararo [mailto:ajq3@spatialnetworks.com]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 2:01 PM
To: gislist@lists.geocomm.com
Subject: [gislist] Shapefiles & Geodatabases

Technically mundane question for some: I've got a ton of shapefiles for a
continuous, contiguous area. Problem is, they are all broken down into
discrete shapefile "sheets". I am more than familiar with the normal
process of "merging" the respective layers to create a extent-wide shapefile
for each layer. However, this poses enormous labor implications, not to
mention cramped mice-fingers. I can certainly important a set of shapefiles
to create a geodatabase, but, it would appear, that the same relative
problem exists: that of creating a lot of geodatabases, each a "sheet" worth
of shapefiles, but not a single "bucket" to dump all shapefiles and come out
smelling like roses, with only one geodatabase "layer" for each feature.
Does this make sense ? Granted, I firmly acknowledge that I am not the
sharpest tool in the shed, but is this a technology limitation of ESRI, a
limitation of database choice, user limitation (yes, me), or a combo ?
Thanks in advance.

Best Regards,

Anthony Quartararo
Spatial NetWorks, Inc

_______________________________________________
gislist mailing list
gislist@lists.geocomm.com
http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist

_________________________________
This list is brought to you by
The GeoCommunity
http://www.geocomm.com/

Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com
_______________________________________________
gislist mailing list
gislist@lists.geocomm.com
http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist

_________________________________
This list is brought to you by
The GeoCommunity
http://www.geocomm.com/

Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group