Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: Re: [gislist] Shapefiles & Geodatabases
Date:  07/24/2004 12:40:00 AM
From:  Paul Ramsey



For a problem like this, you will be hard put to find a more handy
technology than the FME from Safe Software (www.safe.com). Just today
I tiled together data from 7067 mapsheets into a single contiguous data
set using the FME (and a little perl, because that is just who I am).

P.

On Friday, July 23, 2004, at 11:01 AM, Anthony Quartararo wrote:

> Technically mundane question for some: I've got a ton of shapefiles
> for a
> continuous, contiguous area. Problem is, they are all broken down into
> discrete shapefile "sheets". I am more than familiar with the normal
> process of "merging" the respective layers to create a extent-wide
> shapefile
> for each layer. However, this poses enormous labor implications, not
> to
> mention cramped mice-fingers. I can certainly important a set of
> shapefiles
> to create a geodatabase, but, it would appear, that the same relative
> problem exists: that of creating a lot of geodatabases, each a "sheet"
> worth
> of shapefiles, but not a single "bucket" to dump all shapefiles and
> come out
> smelling like roses, with only one geodatabase "layer" for each
> feature.
> Does this make sense ? Granted, I firmly acknowledge that I am not the
> sharpest tool in the shed, but is this a technology limitation of
> ESRI, a
> limitation of database choice, user limitation (yes, me), or a combo ?
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Anthony Quartararo
> Spatial NetWorks, Inc
>
> _______________________________________________
> gislist mailing list
> gislist@lists.geocomm.com
> http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist
>
> _________________________________
> This list is brought to you by
> The GeoCommunity
> http://www.geocomm.com/
>
> Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
> http://www.geobids.com
>
Paul Ramsey
Refractions Research
Email: pramsey@refractions.net
Phone: (250) 885-0632

_______________________________________________
gislist mailing list
gislist@lists.geocomm.com
http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist

_________________________________
This list is brought to you by
The GeoCommunity
http://www.geocomm.com/

Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group