Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: RE: [gislist] Making the *Environmental* in Systems Research Institute somewhat less relevant
Date:  07/28/2004 09:50:01 AM
From:  Anthony Quartararo



Well said Gregory. Note to John:

Not all ESRI product users subscriber to the "warm-fuzzy, tree-hugging,
granola-crunching, berkenstock-wearing, Earth-First! Monkey-wrench gang,
PETA activism" mentality that seems to ooze from Redlands and other parts of
the Pacific Northwest. Furthermore, whatever Mr. Dangermond (aka. Jack)
wants to do with HIS money or HIS company, that's HIS prerogative. Last
time anyone checked, he owned 100% of it. In fact, we Americans (and to a
lesser extent, Canadians and Europeans) wallow in the luxurious notion of
global environmentalism, simply because we are so well-off and so fortunate
that it is no longer a challenge to "live" each day, so with all the "spare"
time on our hands, we think of "sophisticated" ways to hinder the progress
of others [ie. environmentalism in developing countries], while
simultaneously whining about gas that is $2 per gallon, when it really
should be $10 per gallon. Notwithstanding the veracity of the purported
donations, Jack and ESRI have probably done more collectively, to promote
environmental issues in every aspect of a society, across the globe than any
other FOR PROFIT corporation, bar none. So quit yer moaning and vote, just
don't pepper the list with any more left-leaning dribble please. Thank you.

Anthony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: gislist-bounces@lists.geocomm.com
> [mailto:gislist-bounces@lists.geocomm.com] On Behalf Of Ross,
> Gregory K.
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 9:21 AM
> To: 'John Mickelson': 'gislist@lists.geocomm.com'
> Subject: RE: [gislist] Making the *Environmental* in Systems
> Research Institute somewhat less relevant
>
> John,
>
> Not really sure what your post implies, though I have a
> vague idea that you are not happy with our current
> administration and lack the patience to wait until election
> day to voice your opinion.
>
> >From Dictionary. COM:
>
> en*vi*ron*men*tal adj. (n-vrn-mntl, -vrn-)
> 1.Of, relating to, or associated with the environment.
> 2.Relating to or being concerned with the ecological impact
> of altering the environment.
> 3.Medicine. Of or relating to potentially harmful factors
> originating in the
> environment: environmental illness.
>
> One would assume that ESRI uses the first (and most common)
> definition, thereby having NOTHING to do with the second definition.
>
> I have always believed that one has the right to voice there
> opinion at the right place and the right time. How the
> environment is being looked after in this country is a matter
> of opinion. This list is neither the right place or the right
> time for political banter. It reeks of using a source of good (the
> list) to try to sway public opinion (or as I like to call it,
> imposing your beliefs upon me).
>
> Gregory Ross
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Mickelson [mailto:jmickelct@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 10:52 PM
> To: gislist@lists.geocomm.com
> Subject: [gislist] Making the *Environmental* in Systems
> Research Institute somewhat less relevant
>
>
> Hi,
>
> New to the list, came upon this item that, frankly, deeply shocked,
> saddened and, to be honest angered me...
> Just thought that folks might like to have some idea of where
> their hard
> earned software dollars and going to and what kind of a
> "future" their
> investment just may be bringing them (especially
> environmentally speaking).
>
> John Mickelson
>
> (PS the Jerry Lewis mentioned is a Republican representative
> in CA, not
> the comedian...).
> Please also notice the recent (and largest) donations to Ralph Nader
> (somewhat cynical.... so much for his not worth being considerd "a
> spoiler")..
>
> *************************************************
>
> From:
>
> http://www.opensecrets.org/indivs/search.asp?Order=A&txtName=D
> angermond&txtS
> tate=CA&txtZip=&txtEmploy=&txtCand=&txt2004=Y&txt2002=Y&txt200
> 0=Y&txt1998=&t
> xt1996=&txt1994=&txt1992=&txt1990=&txtSoft=N
>
>
> Search Criteria:
> Donor name: Dangermond
> Donor State: CA
> Cycle(s) selected: 2004, 2002, 2000
>
> Start another search <http://www.opensecrets.org/indivs/index.asp>
>
>
>
> Sort by Name
> Sort by Date
> Sort by Amount
>
> Total for this search: $90,500
>
> Contributor
>
>
>
> Occupation
>
>
>
> Date
>
>
>
> Amount
>
>
>
> Recipient
>
> DANGERMOND, LAURA MS
> REDLANDS,CA 92375
>
>
>

Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group