Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: RE: [gislist] GIS software/hardware donations for 3rd World
Date:  01/25/2005 11:30:02 AM
From:  Michael Gould



Confusion reigns, see below.

At 16:49 25/01/2005, Anthony Quartararo wrote:
>Wolf,
>
>As I pointed out, I personally had discussions with many overseas GIS
>professionals, and it was my anecdotal evidence of "99%" that I was
>expressing, not a formal scientific study. Open Source is not a new
>perspective really, GRASS has been around since, well, almost since the=
"big
>bang" yet it has not appreciable impact on the global GIS market.

Impact on the market is not usually a measurement of FOSS success.=20
Thousands of people have chosen Grass over the years, for the ability to=20
play with the C code without restrictive licensing. Some key Grass=20
"players" went on to form OGC, where *some* of that spirit (open=20
interfaces) has rubbed off and *is* making an impact on the GIS market. :-)

>My point
>was not to incite yet another flame-fest about "open source vs. COTS" GIS
>software, not at all.

the flames did not come from any such comparison: the original thread was=20
how to help train people in developing areas via GIS donations.
Then *somebody* said that open source was wrong for that purpose.

>Cheap webserver software (Apache) has nothing to do
>with GIS software.

Is Apache "cheaper" than MS IIS? And is cheaper the distinguishing feature=
=20
of FOSS? Not in my book.

>Mozilla Thunderbird is a great email client. Does it
>have a dent in other COTS email clients? Not really.

Most e-mail clients are freeware or people use demos. Again, the=20
distinction is not normally price. It's licensing.

>To each his own. If
>communities or individuals want to pursue open source, great, more power to
>you (them).

Yes indeed. And if the FOSS is buggy or unsupported it's their problem.=20
Just like in the commercial software world :-)

cheers,
Mike Gould

p.s.- and if commercial entities donate software to developing areas,=20
great, but it should be without strings attached....that is, they should=20
also get free updates, Internet support, etc. Otherwise its "bread for=20
today, starvation tomorrow".



>-----Original Message-----
>
>At 2:31 PM -0500 1/21/05, Anthony Quartararo wrote:
> >I too have heard this very strong desire in the developing world, over
> >and over. However, when pressed, 99% of all people
>
>Anthony, is this a serious statistic for which you can cite an unbiased
>study?
>
> >that bring it up qualify
> >their desire for open source as something they see as the only
> >alternative to ESRI, Intergraph, MapInfo, Autodesk, Smallworld, etc.
> >because of price, bottom line. Has much less to do with the side by
> >side technical capabilities comparison between any/all COTS GIS
> >products. So, the conclusion is, that if the TCO of COTS GIS were more
> >appropriately priced for a global market rather than making it MORE
> >expensive (vs. US pricing) in some international locations, then I
> >would wager that no one would ever entertain open source GIS, except for
>the occasional hobbyist.
>
>"Also, let's refrain from patronizing people in developing countries. "
>
>
>Who's patronizing who ?
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>gislist mailing list
>gislist@lists.geocomm.com
>http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist
>
>_________________________________
>This list is brought to you by
>The GeoCommunity
>http://www.geocomm.com/
>
>Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
>http://www.geobids.com

-----------------------
Michael Gould
Information Systems Department
(Lenguajes y Sistemas Inform=E1ticos)
Universitat Jaume I
E-12071 Castell=F3n, Spain
http://www.mgould.com
GeoInfo group http://www.geoinfo.uji.es
and TeIDE SDI consortium http://redgeomatica.rediris.es/teide/
2005 Vespucci summer school http://www.vespucci.org




_______________________________________________
gislist mailing list
gislist@lists.geocomm.com
http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist

_________________________________
This list is brought to you by
The GeoCommunity
http://www.geocomm.com/

Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group