Confusion reigns, see below.
At 16:49 25/01/2005, Anthony Quartararo wrote: >Wolf, > >As I pointed out, I personally had discussions with many overseas GIS >professionals, and it was my anecdotal evidence of "99%" that I was >expressing, not a formal scientific study. Open Source is not a new >perspective really, GRASS has been around since, well, almost since the= "big >bang" yet it has not appreciable impact on the global GIS market.
Impact on the market is not usually a measurement of FOSS success.=20 Thousands of people have chosen Grass over the years, for the ability to=20 play with the C code without restrictive licensing. Some key Grass=20 "players" went on to form OGC, where *some* of that spirit (open=20 interfaces) has rubbed off and *is* making an impact on the GIS market. :-)
>My point >was not to incite yet another flame-fest about "open source vs. COTS" GIS >software, not at all.
the flames did not come from any such comparison: the original thread was=20 how to help train people in developing areas via GIS donations. Then *somebody* said that open source was wrong for that purpose.
>Cheap webserver software (Apache) has nothing to do >with GIS software.
Is Apache "cheaper" than MS IIS? And is cheaper the distinguishing feature= =20 of FOSS? Not in my book.
>Mozilla Thunderbird is a great email client. Does it >have a dent in other COTS email clients? Not really.
Most e-mail clients are freeware or people use demos. Again, the=20 distinction is not normally price. It's licensing.
>To each his own. If >communities or individuals want to pursue open source, great, more power to >you (them).
Yes indeed. And if the FOSS is buggy or unsupported it's their problem.=20 Just like in the commercial software world :-)
cheers, Mike Gould
p.s.- and if commercial entities donate software to developing areas,=20 great, but it should be without strings attached....that is, they should=20 also get free updates, Internet support, etc. Otherwise its "bread for=20 today, starvation tomorrow".
>-----Original Message----- > >At 2:31 PM -0500 1/21/05, Anthony Quartararo wrote: > >I too have heard this very strong desire in the developing world, over > >and over. However, when pressed, 99% of all people > >Anthony, is this a serious statistic for which you can cite an unbiased >study? > > >that bring it up qualify > >their desire for open source as something they see as the only > >alternative to ESRI, Intergraph, MapInfo, Autodesk, Smallworld, etc. > >because of price, bottom line. Has much less to do with the side by > >side technical capabilities comparison between any/all COTS GIS > >products. So, the conclusion is, that if the TCO of COTS GIS were more > >appropriately priced for a global market rather than making it MORE > >expensive (vs. US pricing) in some international locations, then I > >would wager that no one would ever entertain open source GIS, except for >the occasional hobbyist. > >"Also, let's refrain from patronizing people in developing countries. " > > >Who's patronizing who ? > > >_______________________________________________ >gislist mailing list >gislist@lists.geocomm.com >http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist > >_________________________________ >This list is brought to you by >The GeoCommunity >http://www.geocomm.com/ > >Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids >http://www.geobids.com
----------------------- Michael Gould Information Systems Department (Lenguajes y Sistemas Inform=E1ticos) Universitat Jaume I E-12071 Castell=F3n, Spain http://www.mgould.com GeoInfo group http://www.geoinfo.uji.es and TeIDE SDI consortium http://redgeomatica.rediris.es/teide/ 2005 Vespucci summer school http://www.vespucci.org
_______________________________________________ gislist mailing list gislist@lists.geocomm.com http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist
_________________________________ This list is brought to you by The GeoCommunity http://www.geocomm.com/
Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids http://www.geobids.com
|