Excellent points Pat. ESRI (and others) supposed business partner programs also fall into this category as well. ESRI's strategy, long ago, was to seed the universities with "Arc-speak" at any cost [read: free or just about free licenses] so that newly minted graduates would conclude that GIS = ESRI ["arc" for example, being a proprietary software command line used by ESRI and not necessarily a universally accepted concept], but ask any graduate today about what they know regarding GIS and a good number will start out by saying, "We used ESRI.....". Great strategic vision, if nothing else. The other vendors have not been nearly as successful in trying to push their products down to the formative years of GIS/Geographic education, and so it is true around the world. This is not 100% a bad thing, by any means, but, it does conveniently lead to a natural dominance by ESRI in the global market, one that they are loath to relinquish anytime soon. How many clients have had their systems converted for "free" or "nearly free" if they switch platforms ? Well, that is another vehicle for subsidization, because migrating from Intergraph to ESRI is not cheap by any means. Anyway, I got pummeled on this topic by a number of open source advocates, so I will return to my cave now...
Anthony _______________________________________________ gislist mailing list gislist@lists.geocomm.com http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist
_________________________________ This list is brought to you by The GeoCommunity http://www.geocomm.com/
Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids http://www.geobids.com
|