In my opinion, spatial is no longer special and companies that insist that it is will go the way of the dodo.
BTW, good see you posting to this incarnation of gis-l, Bill.
sonny
-----Original Message----- From: gislist-bounces@lists.thinkburst.com [mailto:gislist-bounces@lists.thinkburst.com]On Behalf Of Bill Thoen Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 9:40 AM To: gislist@lists.thinkburst.com Subject: RE: [gislist] google maps
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Michael Gould wrote:
> Yes, another example of how, when you want to paint fast maps on the > screen, you don't need a heavy GIS-based solution behind the scenes, only a > clever programmer. Terraserver demonstrated this several years back: lots > of server power and lots of GBs, but a simple concept for retrieval and > visualization. The swiss map is even simpler, because they manage fewer > possible tiles.
Makes you wonder why most of the major popular GIS applications (Mapquest, MapPoint, Terraserver, and now Google) are being developed by companies not known for their GIS capabilities.
- Bill Thoen
_______________________________________________ gislist mailing list gislist@lists.geocomm.com http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist
_________________________________ This list is brought to you by The GeoCommunity http://www.geocomm.com/
Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids http://www.geobids.com
_______________________________________________ gislist mailing list gislist@lists.geocomm.com http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist
_________________________________ This list is brought to you by The GeoCommunity http://www.geocomm.com/
Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids http://www.geobids.com
|