Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: RE: [gislist] google maps
Date:  02/17/2005 12:30:02 PM
From:  Anthony Quartararo



Frank,

No baiting going on here, honest. I don't disagree with your points, but I
think that outta the box, in such a rapid deployment of this technology for
Google, while OGCers labor on for a loooooooooooong time, I think it is only
a matter of time before Google steps into other "more complex" arenas, and
perhaps with Keyhole's tools, may hasten that step, and then it will be that
much close to making OGC irrelevant [or perhaps irrelevant] ? I mean, isnt
the OGC imperative strictly limited to the internet domain ? If Google (or
others) blows past OGC efforts (which they are prone to do in other areas of
technology), then what ? Another lister pointed out quite rightly that
"spatial is no longer special", and as much as that burns me up as a
geographer, it is a fast approaching reality for everyone else in the world
EXCEPT the GIS industry. I've abandoned all previous attempts at the
various ways of explaining to non-GIS peeps what I do, and simply point them
to the "cool" and somewhat sexy use of the technology of Keyhole on CNN,
MSNBC, Fox, etc. and then just quip that we do the nuts and bolts work to
make that happen, and it seems to make much more sense than any elevator
pitch in the past. The point being, all things being equal, technology,
just like everything else has an affinity for the path of least resistance.
Complex spatial data handling and processing [via google] or anyone else in
this category of technology may be successful, much more so, BECAUSE they
are very much outside the industry. We shall see I suppose, but Google
alone is worth more than the entire GIS industry put together, and they
didn't just stumble upon that after decades of work.

Anthony

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Warmerdam [mailto:fwarmerdam@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 12:54 PM
To: Anthony Quartararo
Cc: gislist@lists.thinkburst.com
Subject: Re: [gislist] google maps

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:33:00 -0500, Anthony Quartararo
<ajq3@spatialnetworks.com> wrote:
> I am wondering and musing how this implementation of technology, a
> seemingly grand-slam by a non-GIS oriented organization, will impact
> and affect the OGC [and all organizations who put so much effort and
> $$ into that], because it appears on the surface at least, that
> Google, if not Microsoft, and others have essentially bypassed the OGC
> imperatives and done it in grand style and with reasonable success.

Anthony,

I am impressed by the job that Google has done on it's mapping application,
but it is not fundamentally different than mapquest or a variety of other
consumer mapping web applications.

The web mapping (WMS) work at OGC is aimed at achieving a degree of
interoperability that allows layers of data from a variety of different back
end servers to be used in a variety of kinds of clients. That is certainly
not achieved by Google, nor was it their intention.

It seems like an apple and oranges comparison to me. They are working to
achieve different things.

One lesson I would tend to take away from this is that there is a large part
of the market that is adequately served by a one-vendor
and inflexible solution like google maps. I think more complex
technology and interoperability are useful in more sophisticated
applications and uses.

Damn, and I promised myself last year I wouldn't rise to your OGC-baiting
again.

Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------
---------------------------------------+------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam,
warmerdam@pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Programmer for Rent


_______________________________________________
gislist mailing list
gislist@lists.geocomm.com
http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist

_________________________________
This list is brought to you by
The GeoCommunity
http://www.geocomm.com/

Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com

Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group