|
|
| GeoCommunity Mailing List |
| |
| Mailing List Archives |
| Subject: | RE: [gislist] google maps |
| Date: |
02/17/2005 12:30:02 PM |
| From: |
Sonny Parafina |
|
|
Anthony,
I'll echo Frank's comments and say that they are different things. I see
google maps as great thing because it is yet another service we can consume
in the OGC framework. If it becomes a defacto standard, then it is easily
accomodated in the OGC Service Oriented Architecture. Regardless of the
technology, it would be trivial to proxy Google maps and provide a WMS
interface. In fact, if anyone at google is listening, I think they should
provide a WMS interface.
BTW, I don't think this OGC-baiting and a good question.
sonny
-----Original Message-----
From: gislist-bounces@lists.thinkburst.com
[mailto:gislist-bounces@lists.thinkburst.com]On Behalf Of Frank
Warmerdam
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 12:54 PM
To: Anthony Quartararo
Cc: gislist@lists.thinkburst.com
Subject: Re: [gislist] google maps
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:33:00 -0500, Anthony Quartararo
<ajq3@spatialnetworks.com> wrote:
> I am wondering and musing how this implementation of technology, a
seemingly
> grand-slam by a non-GIS oriented organization, will impact and affect the
> OGC [and all organizations who put so much effort and $$ into that],
because
> it appears on the surface at least, that Google, if not Microsoft, and
> others have essentially bypassed the OGC imperatives and done it in grand
> style and with reasonable success.
Anthony,
I am impressed by the job that Google has done on it's mapping
application, but it is not fundamentally different than mapquest or
a variety of other consumer mapping web applications.
The web mapping (WMS) work at OGC is aimed at achieving a
degree of interoperability that allows layers of data from a variety
of different back end servers to be used in a variety of kinds of
clients. That is certainly not achieved by Google, nor was it
their intention.
It seems like an apple and oranges comparison to me. They are
working to achieve different things.
One lesson I would tend to take away from this is that there is a
large part of the market that is adequately served by a one-vendor
and inflexible solution like google maps. I think more complex
technology and interoperability are useful in more sophisticated
applications and uses.
Damn, and I promised myself last year I wouldn't rise to your
OGC-baiting again.
Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
--
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam,
warmerdam@pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Programmer for Rent
_______________________________________________
gislist mailing list
gislist@lists.geocomm.com
http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist
_________________________________
This list is brought to you by
The GeoCommunity
http://www.geocomm.com/
Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com
_______________________________________________
gislist mailing list
gislist@lists.geocomm.com
http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist
_________________________________
This list is brought to you by
The GeoCommunity
http://www.geocomm.com/
Get Access to the latest GIS & Geospatial Industry RFPs and bids
http://www.geobids.com
|
|
Sponsored by:
For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!
|
