Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: Re: [gislist] Global area calculations
Date:  06/30/2005 07:20:01 AM
From:  Quantitative Decisions



At 03:05 PM 6/29/2005 -0700, Brian Klinkenberg wrote:
>I have a student who has a geodatabase that contains protected areas from
>around the world. She needs to calculate the areas (ha) of each of the
>areas. What means would people suggest as the best approach to take?
...
>I forgot to make something clear -- the file is in lat/long,
>so obtaining the areas directly is not possible. Standard
>'global' projections introduce too much error in the results,
>so they aren't a choice.

The crude expedient of computing the unprojected area (applying Euclidean
formulas, not spherical formulas, to the lon-lat coordinates) and then
multiplying by the cosine of the latitude of the region's centroid will
typically obtain the area to within 0.5% for most of the countries and
territories in the world (using about 111.1 km per degree to convert to
hectares). You will get better accuracy for the necessarily smaller
protected areas lying within a country.

Using *any* global equal-area projection will make *no* error relative to
the ellipsoid used to model the earth's surface (apart from any numerical
imprecision, which in many GISes will be far smaller than the error
inherent in the numerical representation of each region's boundary). The
only way you could do better would be to adopt varying region-specific
ellipsoids that (slightly) better approximate each region, perform the
necessary datum transformations, then use equal-area projections. We're
talking parts per million differences here: it's difficult to imagine a
situation where that would matter. For almost any conceivable analysis of
the size of protected regions, two or three significant digits will suffice.

Absent quantitative information about how much error is "too much," it is
not possible to recommend a "best approach."

--Bill Huber
Quantitative Decisions
www.quantdec.com

_______________________________________________
gislist mailing list
gislist@lists.geocomm.com
http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist

_________________________________
This list is brought to you by
The GeoCommunity
http://www.geocomm.com/

Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group