Hi all!
One more respondent to this interesting mail. Obviously the shift in paradi= gm from a traditional tool for the use for specialist to business people fo= r decision making and analysis, has been a big revolution. =
But, in a developing country like India where GIS is still in the acceptanc= e mode. People still feel the need of complete assurance before adopting f= or GIS. Unless the government factor is introduced. But compared to may be = 90=92s, people now a days are more keen on knowing about GIS and trying to = experiment in which way they could incorporate GIS for their applications. = Even certain sects which where hesitant to introduce GIS due to the cost fa= ctor associated with it are now slowly changing there orientation. Which ba= sically is a good sign for country like India due to the potential it posse= ss. =
But somehow I still fell that the charm of GIS has been over shadowed by th= e excessive involvement of IT along with it. =
Many of my colleagues in various organizations around always ask me if its = so advantageous then why is it not so commonly used? I said its part of tec= hnological evolution you have to let it evolve and I=92m sure keeping the c= urrent rate of technological development, it will sooner be more better acc= epted.
Peace! Ganapathy
---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "hvp" <hvp@regiononepdc.org> Reply-To: hvp@regiononepdc.org Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 12:11:14 -0400
> >...on another note: however much i may have had disagreements with, i miss= the view-points and occasional rants of dimitri etc. we had google maps+go= ogle/virtual earth launched earlier, but not much discussion on the blindsi= ding in this list. >harsh prakash > >---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- >From: "Anthony Quartararo" <ajq3@spatialnetworks.com> >Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 11:23:43 -0400 > >At the risk of being in the minority on this issue, I think the days of GIS >professionals having "command of the powers" of spatial analysis, as an >exclusive club, are long gone and the genie can never be put back in the >bottle. Is that a great thing, well, not necessarily for true-blue >geographers, however, it is a long, sought-after validation of the >profession. The general acceptance and mainstreaming of the technology, in >whole or in parts, is something that should be applauded as "about damn >time", and not cause dedicated professionals to retreat to the highest >points of the ivory tower. =
> >"Is the GIS world becoming too complex ?" Hardly... =
> >"GIS" is not, nor has it ever been the exclusive domain for so called >"environmental" applications, and the fact that "GIS" technology is finding >new and ever creative and innovative applications in domains other than >"environmentally warm and fuzzy" fields, is of tremendous value to the >industry, the profession and the overall growth and advancement of the >technology. =
> >What would you have "GIS" do, remove itself from everything except watersh= ed >analysis, habitat conservation studies, etc ? Is GoogleEarth that much of a >threat ? =
> >The market "gets a vote", and if there is no value in a particular service >or product offering that using GIS technology, count on the market to >determine whether or not that product/service has a short life span or not. >The fact that there are still GIS professionals, foresters, wildlife >biologist, business demographers, analysts, developers, researchers and >academics involved, ever day in GIS theory, practice and innovation is both >cause and effect, that is, proof that we are still needed, and still >important to our own universe and the greater universe at large, regardless >of what your business card reads. > >Anthony > >-----Original Message----- >From: gislist-bounces@lists.geocomm.com >[mailto:gislist-bounces@lists.geocomm.com] On Behalf Of Fiona Gregory >Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 10:54 PM >To: gislist@lists.geocomm.com >Subject: [gislist] What is happening to GIS? > >Internet map servers... > >..spatial database engines.. > >..object oriented programming.. > >and all most end users really want to do is map our data. And maybe do a >little spatial analysis. Like we learned that GIS was supposed to be for, >way back in our first Intro to GIS class, except we never did get to >analysis part, because we spend the whole course trying to figure out why >the program kept hanging. Then when we got menus instead of command lines, >we thought the age of "GIS for everyone" was dawning. And now... > >Am I crazy, or is the GIS world getting way too complex? Deeper and deeper >into the rarefied
|