Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: [gislist] schematics for scale-independent data
Date:  12/08/2005 12:35:01 PM
From:  Dupler, Phillip



I'm interested in public opinions regarding the issue of using an extension like ESRI's Schematics to produce detailed maps at 1:2400 scale from GPS'd utility network data vs. just simply drawing and storing the features such that everything appears clear and connectivity is understandable at 1:2400 scale. We're dealing here of course with the age-old problem of having to space things apart so that symbols and lines don't overlap or blend together on a paper map. I'm looking at two options, either edit our GPS'd data for map clarity at scale and later write/purchase some utility that would "snap" the network back to the "real" GPS coordinates and feature lengths (stored as attributes) when we need to view it that way (this was the option chosen when we started the project and before Schematics was available), OR given this new technology, leave the network drawn exactly as it was GPS'd and generate these schematic geo-diagrams for publication as maps. From an initial review, the extension has some pretty cool tools for generating that spacing, rotating symbols, etc, but its not real intelligent, so it seems nearly the same amount of editing either way. I don't think that publishing scale-dependant maps from scale-independant data was really the intended use of the extension, but it appears to have that capability. I realize that not many people have had a chance to implement or even test Schematics yet so regardless if you don't have direct experience, if conceptually you see problems with doing things this new way or benefits, then I'd appreciate the input.

Phil Dupler
_______________________________________________
gislist mailing list
gislist@lists.geocomm.com
http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist

_________________________________
This list is brought to you by
The GeoCommunity
http://www.geocomm.com/

Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group