Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: Re: [gislist] Technical question: Areal accuracy standards?
Date:  08/12/2007 07:09:52 AM
From:  Bruce.Bannerman .. dpi.vic.gov.au



Heather,

This really needs to be considered on a case by case basis.

Some areal features may be describing geographic phenomena that can be
accurately represented in polygonal form e.g. Cadastral boundaries.

However, often areal features are used to describe phenomena that may not
have crisp, well defined boundaries, e.g. geology, soils, drainage,
vegetation, areas subject to inundation etc. Vector boundaries describing
these features are usually the result of an interpretation and educated
guess. These types of features may be better modelled as raster surfaces.

Often the original phenomena is captured in vector form at a point in
time, e.g. the edge of a lake. However the lake shoreline will usually
vary in location depending on season, rainfall, snowmelt, drought etc.


Considering the above, some data sets could be accurately defined, while
many probably could not.

In the end it will still come down to validating your data against 'well
defined' points.

However, also consider how the location used to define the 'well defined'
points was originally defined.


Considering the above, it may not be meaningful to place an arbitrary
accuracy value on the dataset. An approach that many people use is to make
an educated assessment of the accuracy of the data by relating it back to
well defined points, but also to include Metadata that adequately
describes the data, including: what it is intended to portray: how it was
defined and captured: as well as its intended use. The end user will then
be able to assess the suitability of the data for their particular use.


Bruce
---------------------------------------

Bruce Bannerman
IT Solutions Architect - GIS


Information Development Branch
Minerals and Petroleum Division
Department of Primary Industries - Victoria
Australia






"Gordon, Heather C." <HEATHER.C.GORDON@saic.com>
Sent by: gislist-bounces@lists.geocomm.com
10/08/2007 11:10 AM

To
<gislist@lists.geocomm.com>
cc

Subject
[gislist] Technical question: Areal accuracy standards?






Hi all,
Here's my my issue, for which I could use some perspective: we all are
pretty familiar with the FGDC standards for data accuracy, wherein a point
location has to be within so many feet of the true location at the given
scale. However, how does that translate into accuracy over an area? Would
that be dependent on the number of vertices (assume that each point must
be within the given distance of the true location)? Or would it pertain to
the 95% confidence interval
[http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/projects/FGDC-standards-projects/accuracy/part3/chapter3:
page 7].

If you have any books or online articles/webpages that would offer
clarification, I would be indebted.
Thanks for your help,
HC Gordon

_______________________________________________
gislist mailing list
gislist@lists.geocomm.com
http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist

_________________________________
This list is brought to you by
The GeoCommunity
http://www.geocomm.com/


Notice:
This email and any attachments may contain information that is personal,
confidential, legally privileged and/or copyright.No part of it should be reproduced,
adapted or communicated without the prior written consent of the copyright owner.

It is the responsibility of the recipient to check for and remove viruses.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by return email, delete
it from your system and destroy any copies. You are not authorised to use, communicate or rely on the information
contained in this email.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.
_______________________________________________
gislist mailing list
gislist@lists.geocomm.com
http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist

_________________________________
This list is brought to you by
The GeoCommunity
http://www.geocomm.com/

Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group