Proceed to GeoCommunity Home Page


SpatialNewsGIS Data DepotGeoImaging ChannelGIS and MappingSoftwareGIS JobsGeoBids-RFPsGeoCommunity MarketplaceGIS Event Listings
HomeLoginAccountsAboutContactAdvertiseSearchFAQsForumsCartFree Newsletter

Sponsored by:


TOPICS
Today's News

Submit News

Feature Articles

Product Reviews

Education

News Affiliates

Discussions

Newsletters

Email Lists

Polls

Editor's Corner


SpatialNews Daily Newswire!
Subscribe now!

Latest Industry Headlines
SiteVision GIS Partnership With City of Roanoke VA Goes Live
Garmin® Introduces Delta™ Upland Remote Trainer with Beeper
Caliper Offers Updated Chile Data for Use with Maptitude 2013
Southampton’s Go! Rhinos Trail Mapped by Ordnance Survey
New Approach to Measuring Coral Growth Offers Valuable Tool for Reef Managers
Topo ly - Tailor-Fit for Companies' Online Mapping Needs

Latest GeoBids-RFPs
Nautical Charts*Poland
Software & Telemetry GPS
Spatial Data Management-DC
Geospatial and Mapping-DC
Next-Gen 911-MO

Recent Job Opportunities
Planner/GIS Specialist
Team Leader- Grape Supply Systems
Geospatial Developer

Recent Discussions
Raster images
cartographic symbology
Telephone Exchange areas in Europe
Problem showcasing Vector map on Windows CE device
Base map

GeoCommunity Mailing List
 
Mailing List Archives

Subject: Re: [gislist] Recent Discussions and more...
Date:  10/18/2007 12:10:00 PM
From:  Patrick Weber



This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000305080006080603000700
Content-Type: text/plain: charset=ISO-8859-1: format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Jaime

if you want to moderate this forum, than there will be no traffic at all
anymore, its quite dead anyway. I havent seen any volume of spam or
whatever you want to consider spam that would have offended me. So its
fine as it is.

Jaime Bozza wrote:
> With the recent thread regarding "cracked" software, I wanted to open up
> a discussion regarding this list with respect to moderation and general
> policies. I'd like to work toward some more formal policies for the
> list without infringing on the ability to post opinions and thoughts
> that may not necessarily be agreeable to all. Obviously, there are a
> lot of different people on this list with many different levels of skill
> and I think that will always allow for helpful and (at times) very
> interesting and lively discussions.
>
> First of all, I want to say that I did see the message come through and
> I specifically waited to gather reaction from list members before I did
> anything. I do *not* want to turn this list into a completely moderated
> list. Unfortunately, to stop these messages from ever being posted
> would require full moderation and I think that would start to overly
> restrict the general flow of the list and perhaps even hurt the freedom
> that has been enjoyed by this list. That being said, I have already set
> this user's access to be moderated and will not allow additional
> messages coming from this person without verifying that the content is
> appropriate. Discussions about anything illegal (software piracy and
> more) will not be tolerated and I'm sure most of the people on this list
> will agree. Personally I don't mind someone criticizing a message (and
> the person) and even having a little fun here or there, but at the same
> time I want to get people's opinions on this. How far do you think we
> should go to moderate threads such as these and the list in general?
> What subjects and types of messages do you think should be allowed or
> disallowed?
>
> For instance, what are your thoughts about any of these:
>
> 1) Obvious sales-type messages. For instance, a list poster that's an
> owner of a software company that replies to each message attempting to
> sell their particular software product.
>
> 2) Obvious marketing or advertising messages. For instance, events
> (including coursework or seminars) that require a fee to attend, with
> the intent to freely advertise to the people on the list.
>
> 3) Job postings, press releases, or anything else that is posted by a
> company that is marketing or advertising only for that company and
> doesn't generally offer any type of real discussion.
>
>
> Also, I've followed many of the discussions about what specifically this
> list should discuss. For instance, specific help on products (ESRI or
> otherwise) - Do you feel this is an appropriate forum? Should this be a
> list more for general discussions and not specific product support?
> Would
>
> I've also seen people recommend using Google or some other product to
> transform a list into something more of a discussion board. How do you
> feel about discussion boards compared to old-style mailing lists? Do
> you prefer one over the other? Do you think a discussion board with
> topics and threads would work better?
>
> I'm open to any ideas and thoughts, so feel free to speak your mind!
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Jaime Bozza
> MindSites Group, LLC
>
> _______________________________________________
> gislist mailing list
> gislist@lists.geocomm.com
> http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist
>
> _________________________________
> This list is brought to you by
> The GeoCommunity
> http://www.geocomm.com/
>

--------------000305080006080603000700
Content-Type: text/plain: charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
gislist mailing list
gislist@lists.geocomm.com
http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist

_________________________________
This list is brought to you by
The GeoCommunity
http://www.geocomm.com/

--------------000305080006080603000700--

Sponsored by:

For information
regarding
advertising rates
Click Here!

Copyright© 1995-2012 MindSites Group / Privacy Policy

GeoCommunity™, Wireless Developer Network™, GIS Data Depot®, and Spatial News™
including all logos and other service marks
are registered trademarks and trade communities of
MindSites Group