Jaime,
You wrote: " What about employers (or companies) using the list simply for sales, marketing, jobs, etc, without otherwise contributing to the list? If someone never posted to the list except for marketing messages a couple of times a week? What would you consider out of hand?"
Yup. If you want to post about sales and marketing stuff I think you should have an active role in other discussions from which you do not profit. This shouldn't be a classifieds list.
Landon
-----Original Message----- From: Jaime Bozza [mailto:jbozza@mindsites.com] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 11:08 AM To: Landon Blake Subject: RE: [gislist] Recent Discussions and more...
> -----Original Message----- > From: Landon Blake [mailto:lblake@ksninc.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 12:08 PM > To: Jaime Bozza > Subject: RE: [gislist] Recent Discussions and more... > > Jaime, > > Thank you for asking our opinion. I know I would like to know who > "owns" or "maintains" this list. Is that you, or someone else?
That would be MindSites Group, which owns the GeoCommunity website. I am the owner of MindSites Group, so I guess that would mean that I own this list as well. :)
> As you can see from the post about hacking GeoPDF, this mailing list is > self-policing in many ways! > > The list is also relatively low traffic, so I don't have a problem with > the occasional announcement, as long as these don't get out of hand. I > really don't mind people looking for employees or looking for work at > all.
What about employers (or companies) using the list simply for sales, marketing, jobs, etc, without otherwise contributing to the list? If someone never posted to the list except for marketing messages a couple of times a week? What would you consider out of hand?
> I don't mind someone offering there software as a solution to a problem > occasionally, as long as they take an active role in the list on other > occasions. Tripp is a good example of this. > > In summary, I don't think this list needs active moderation. We are > good about self-policing. Some more clearly defined policies on what > is acceptable might be a benefit though.
This is exactly why I started this thread. Some direction may be needed.
I replied directly to you since you replied directly to me, since I was unsure if you meant to keep this off the list. If not, I'll go ahead and repost this reply to the list as well.
Sincerely,
Jaime Bozza MindSites Group, LLC
Warning: Information provided via electronic media is not guaranteed against defects including translation and transmission errors. If the reader is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately. _______________________________________________ gislist mailing list gislist@lists.geocomm.com http://lists.geocomm.com/mailman/listinfo/gislist
_________________________________ This list is brought to you by The GeoCommunity http://www.geocomm.com/
|